Timelike geodesic curves for two-dimensional metric

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fisherlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Geodesic
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving timelike geodesic curves using the Euler-Lagrange equation for a two-dimensional metric. The initial equation is manipulated to express a constant in terms of the derivatives of position and time. A subsequent equation is derived from the metric, leading to a relationship involving the constants and derivatives. The conversation highlights the importance of substituting specific values, like setting c=1, to simplify the equations. Additionally, there is a suggestion to utilize SageMath for further exploration, with a note about a potential typo in a related physics paper.
Fisherlam
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
For the two-dimensional metric ##ds^2 = [dx^2 + c^2dt^2] /(\alpha t^{-2})##, with ##\alpha## being a constant of appropriate dimensions, show that $$\frac{dx/dt}{\sqrt{1-(dx/dt)^2}}$$ is constant and hence, or otherwise, find all timelike geodesic curves.
Relevant Equations
$$L=g_{ab}\dot{x}^a\dot{x}^b $$ $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial }{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}\right) $$
Using EL equation, $$L=\left(\frac{t^2}{\alpha}\dot{x}^2-\frac{c^2t^2}{\alpha}\dot{t}^2\right)^{0.5} \Longrightarrow \mathrm{constant} =\left(\dot{x}^2 -c^2 \dot{t}^2\right)^{-0.5} \left(\frac{t^2}{\alpha}\right)^{0.5} \dot{x}$$.

Get another equation from the metric: $$ds^2=-\frac{c^2t^2}\alpha dt^2+\frac{t^2}\alpha dx^2=c^2d\tau^2\quad\Longrightarrow\quad-\frac{c^2t^2}\alpha t^2+\frac{t^2}\alpha\dot{x}^2=c^2\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\frac{t^2}\alpha=\frac{c^2}{\dot{x}^2-c^2\dot{t}^2}$$

Substitution and set ##c=1##: $$\mathrm{constant}=\left(\dot{x}^2-c^2\dot{t}^2\right)^{-0.5}\left(\frac{t^2}\alpha\right)^{0.5}\dot{x}=\frac{c\dot{x}}{\dot{x}^2-c^2\dot{t}^2}=\frac{\dot{x}}{\dot{x}^2-\dot{t}^2}=\cdots?$$

I think I am close but clearly missing something...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've done some digging and if this comes from the Cambridge Part II Physics 2021 past paper, then this is actually a typo. They actually wanted you to find the first conserved quantity which you've obtained from the E-L equations.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...