Timoshenko - Euler Bernoulli In Plane Curved Beams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differential equations relevant to Timoshenko and Euler Bernoulli beam theory specifically for curved in-plane beams. It emphasizes the distinction between beams subjected to out-of-plane forces and those with initial curvature in the longitudinal section. Key contributors to this field include Winkler, Bach, Gibson, Ritchie, Wilson, Quereau, Dolan, and Levin. A recommended resource is a 2011 document that provides analytical theory and calibration results for curved beam analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Timoshenko and Euler Bernoulli beam theory
  • Familiarity with differential equations in structural analysis
  • Knowledge of torsion effects in beam theory
  • Basic concepts of curvature in structural engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "curved beam theory" and its applications in engineering
  • Study the analytical methods proposed by Winkler and Bach
  • Examine the 2011 document for calibration techniques in curved beam analysis
  • Explore the effects of torsion in curved beams
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, researchers in mechanical engineering, and students studying advanced beam theory will benefit from this discussion.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Folks,

Searches of Timoshenko and Euler Bernoulli Beam Theory show differential equations for straight beams.

Is there any material out there illustrating differential equations for "curved in plane beams"..?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, there's quite a bit. Google 'curved beams'.
 
First and foremost you need to distinguish between beams curved in plan ie those subject to out of plane forces and those initially curved in longitudinal section.

Consideration of torsion is essential with the first type.

I am assuming you mean the second.
This type of beam can be examined under two headings

Those for which the initial Radius is >> the cross section dimensions (small curvature)

Those for which the initial Radius is of the same order as the cross section dimensions (larfe curvature)

Both require variations from simple straight beam theory.

Names associated with this tyype of curved beam theory are

Winkler and Bach
Gibson and Ritchie
Wilson and Quereau
Dolan and Levin

You might find this document (2011) interesting as it lists some analystical theory and some results that you can calibrate your work against.

http://duebjri.pci.org/view_file.cfm?file=JL-80-JULY-AUGUST-11.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K