Tip current in STM (fractional error problem)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves deriving an expression for the fractional change in tip current in a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) as a function of the fractional change in tip spacing. The original poster also seeks to determine appropriate voltage values that would lead to a significant decrease in current with a small increase in spacing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply an error formula to find the fractional change in current but expresses confusion regarding the independence of the voltage in their calculations. Other participants suggest that the linear approximation may not be valid for larger changes and discuss the relationship between absolute changes in spacing and fractional changes in current.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to relate changes in spacing to changes in current, with some noting the limitations of linear approximations. There is a recognition that the work function may depend on voltage, prompting a reconsideration of assumptions regarding the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential typo regarding the work function and its dependence on voltage, which may affect the interpretation of the problem. The original poster initially assumed a constant work function but later acknowledged that it varies with voltage.

Ziggy12
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the STM tip current is given by

i = aV e^{-A\phi^{1/2}s}

a) Derive an expression for the fractional change in tip current as function of fractional change in tip spacing s.

b) If \phi = 4V select a reasonable set of V values so that a 1Å increase in s will cause a factor of 10 decrease in i. (a and A are given)

Homework Equations


Given in problem

The Attempt at a Solution



It's probably very simple but I'm stuck. I'm simply using error formula to get that
\delta i = \frac{\partial i}{\partial s} \delta s = -A\phi^{1/2} \cdot i \cdot \delta s

And then I move out i to the left side to get the fractional change in current.
But that doesn't seem correct. Because then I don't understand how I am supposed to solve b), since the fractional change is independent of V.

I tried other ways as well, but V seems to dissaperar out of the equation anytime I do that.
If anyone has a good idea on how to proceed, it would be welcome.
Thanks
// John[/B]
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot at mai 15 23-55-53.png
    Screenshot at mai 15 23-55-53.png
    31.3 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
If the current changes by a factor 10, your linear approximation doesn't work any more - but then there is no formula relating a fractional change in s to a fractional change in i. There is a formula relating an absolute change in s to a fractional change in i, a more general version of the formula you derived (which only works for small changes in s).
 
Yes I could simply divide the current at two different distances to get

\frac{i(s+\delta s)}{i(s)} = \frac{aVe^{-A\psi^{1/2}(s+\delta s)}}{aVe^{-A\psi^{1/2}s}} = e^{-A\psi^{1/2}\delta s}

but then again, this is independent of the voltage V, so I don't see how I am supposed to solve the second question.

The fractional change in current is the same regardless of the applied voltage (just like for exponential decay where the half life depends only on lambda).
 
Ziggy12 said:
this is independent of the voltage V
Not if ##\phi## (now ##\psi##?) depends on the voltage.
 
Yes sorry about that, it was a typo. Phi is the work function
Well I looked it up and the work function does depend on voltage, so I guess I have to assume that
\phi = (V-4)\hspace{0.1cm}\mathrm{Volts}, and not just 4 Volts as one could think from the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K