MHB Tips for Eating Healthy on a Budget

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joelly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    budget Tips
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining if the mapping from the set of numbers of the form \(a + b\sqrt{2}\) to matrices of the form \(\begin{bmatrix} a & 2b \\ b & a \end{bmatrix}\) is an isomorphism. It confirms that the mapping is both one-to-one and onto. To establish that it preserves multiplication, the products of two numbers and their corresponding matrices must be compared. Additionally, the discussion emphasizes the need to check if the mapping preserves addition by comparing the sums of the pairs. The conclusion is that both operations should be verified to confirm the isomorphism.
Joelly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Screenshot_20201124-075914.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An obvious "guess", practically forced by the way the problem is stated, is the function that maps $a+ b\sqrt{2}$ to $\begin{bmatrix} a & 2b \\ b & a \end{bmatrix}$. Is that an isomorphism? That is, is it "one to one", is it "onto", and does it "preserve the operation".

The first two are simple. To prove that this "preserves the operation" you need to take two members of the first set, $a+ b\sqrt{2}$ and $x+ y\sqrt{2}$, which map to $\begin{bmatrix}a & 2b \\ b & a\end{bmatrix}$ and $\begin{bmatrix}x & 2y \\ y & a\end{bmatrix}$ and show that the product $(a+ b\sqrt{2})(x+ y\sqrt{2})$ maps to the product $\begin{bmatrix}a & 2b \\ b & a \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x & 2y \\ y & x\end{bmatrix}$.

Do those two multiplications and compare them.

To determine whether they are also isomorphic under addition, add those pairs and compare them.
 
16062493205342739592651299882084.jpg
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
842
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K