To find the forces acting in a system in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around resolving forces in a system in equilibrium, specifically focusing on the calculations involving a ring and a rod system. The initial confusion stemmed from incorrectly accounting for the torque produced by the weight of rod BC when analyzing the forces acting on the ring. Upon realizing that the system should be considered as a whole, including both the ring and rod BC, the correct torque was identified, leading to the resolution of the problem. The participants noted that as the angle between the bars increases, the horizontal reaction forces and necessary friction at the ring also increase significantly. This highlights the importance of understanding the mechanics involved in such systems for accurate calculations.
gnits
Messages
137
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
To find the forces acting in a system in equilibrium
Relevant Equations
moments
Could I please ask where I have gone wrong with my reasoning in the following question:

nowp.JPG


The answers in given in the book are:

(1/2)W tan(Ө)
W
vertically
(1/2)W tan(Ө) horizontally

Here is my diagram:

now.png

Considering the system as a whole:

(In the text below "Ya" and "Xa" are the forces at the hinge at A)

Resolving vertically gives:

Ya + R = 2W + ω (call this "equation 1")

Resolving horizontally gives:

F = Xa (this agrees with the book answer)

Taking moments about C gives:

W * a sin(Ө) + W * 3a * sin(Ө) = Ya * 4a * sin(Ө)

which gives:

Ya = W (this agrees with the book answer)

And so from "equation 1" we have that R = W + ω (call this "equation 2")

Now, considering the ring alone and taking moments about B gives:

R * 2a * sin(Ө) = ω * 2a * sin(Ө) + F * 2a * cos(Ө)

which gives:

R * tan(Ө) = ω * tan(Ө) + F

So using "equation 2" gives:

F = W * tan(Ө)

But book answer is F = (1/2) * W * tan(Ө)

Where have I reasoned wrongly?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gnits said:
Now, considering the ring alone and taking moments about B gives:

R * 2a * sin(Ө) = ω * 2a * sin(Ө) + F * 2a * cos(Ө)
You have forgotten the moment (torque) produced by BC's weight.
 
Steve4Physics said:
You have forgotten the moment (torque) produced by BC's weight.
Thanks very much for that. Indeed, if I include the torque produced by BC's weight everything works out.

This torque is given by W * a sin(Ө)I guess I am having trouble justifying to myself, why, when I am considering forces on the ring only, I need to include W due to the weight of BC in this way. If I imagine a diagram with the ring only then, if anything, I would label the force on the ring due to BC as being an arrow pointing vertically downwards from the ring of magnitude W. But then it's moment about B would be be

W * 2a * sin(Ө)

not W * a * sin(Ө) as I use above to get the right answer?

How am I thinking of this wrongly?

*EDIT* I think that my confusion is one of visualization. I think that, "mentally", I should be thinking in terms of considering "the rod BC and the ring" as the entity which I am considering in isolation, rather than just "the ring", then indeed I would use W * a sin(Ө)
 
Last edited:
You have a mechanism that would tend to relocate itself to the point of lowest potential energy, where bars AB and BC would become both vertical if nothing would be holding ring C in its position.
AB would simply rotate, while BC must rotate and move, while following the circular trajectory of point B on one end and a horizontal trajectory on the other end.
 
Thanks all for the replies. They have helped me to solve to problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and Lnewqban
gnits said:
Thanks all for the replies. They have helped me to solve to problem.
As the angle between the bars increases, the magnitude of the horizontal reaction at pivot A and the necessary friction force at ring C dramatically increases.
At 180 degrees, the value of those forces will be infinite.

Please, see this practical application of this principle of increasing mechanical advantage:
https://roperescuetraining.com/physics_angles.php

You are welcome. :)
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top