How Do You Determine the Implicit Equation of a Plane from a Line and Origin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loppyfoot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Vector
Click For Summary
To determine the implicit equation of a plane containing the origin and the line defined by L(t) = <1+t, 1-t, 2t>, one must identify a point on the line, P = (1, 1, 0), and a direction vector, v = <1, -1, 2>. The implicit equation can be expressed in the form ax + by + cz = d, where substituting the origin (0, 0, 0) yields d = 0. To find the normal vector to the plane, two non-parallel vectors in the plane must be established, which can be achieved by using points like (0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 0), and (2, 0, 2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the cross product of two valid vectors to derive the normal vector needed for the plane's equation.
Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the implicit form for the plane that contains the origin and the line:

L(t) = <1+t,1-t,2t>

The Attempt at a Solution

'

So, the point P = (1,1,0) and vector v= <1,-1,2>.

To find the implicit equation for the plane using the form ax + by + cz = d , I will substitute the vector values in for a, b, and c. So I get

x -y + 2z = d.

My question is, should I use the origin points, (o,o,o) and substitute them in for x,y, and z to get d=0, or is there another process to this?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________#2. The function f(t) = (t^@,1/t) represents a curve in the plane parametrically. write an equation in parametric form for the tangent line to this curve at the point where t= 2.

So I solve the gradient: <2t, -1/(t^2)> and at t=2 the point is (4, 1/4).
and the gradient normal to t=2 is <4,-1/4>.

So would the parametric equation be (4,1/4) +t<4,-1/4> ?

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loppyfoot said:

Homework Statement



Find the implicit form for the plane that contains the origin and the line:

L(t) = <1+t,1-t,2t>



The Attempt at a Solution

'

So, the point P = (1,1,0) and vector v= <1,-1,2>.
What about them? A clearer way of saying this is that P = (1, 1, 0) is on the line, and the vector v = <1, -1, 2> has the same direction as the line.

What you know about the plane is that it contains the point (0, 0, 0) and the line.

To find the equation of a plane, you need one point on the plane and the normal to the plane. If you have two vectors that lie in the plane, how can you get a third vector that is normal to the plane?
Loppyfoot said:
To find the implicit equation for the plane using the form ax + by + cz = d , I will substitute the vector values in for a, b, and c. So I get

x -y + 2z = d.

My question is, should I use the origin points, (o,o,o) and substitute them in for x,y, and z to get d=0, or is there another process to this?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


#2. The function f(t) = (t^@,1/t) represents a curve in the plane parametrically. write an equation in parametric form for the tangent line to this curve at the point where t= 2.

So I solve the gradient: <2t, -1/(t^2)> and at t=2 the point is (4, 1/4).
and the gradient normal to t=2 is <4,-1/4>.

So would the parametric equation be (4,1/4) +t<4,-1/4> ?

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Ok, so since the vector is pointing in the same direction as the line, I understand that I should use the cross product between two vectors. I understand that I have one vector, <1,-1,2> but how would I find the second vector? Should I use the vector <-1,1,-2> and take the cross product between those two?
 
Loppyfoot said:
Ok, so since the vector is pointing in the same direction as the line, I understand that I should use the cross product between two vectors. I understand that I have one vector, <1,-1,2> but how would I find the second vector? Should I use the vector <-1,1,-2> and take the cross product between those two?
No. If you cross those two vectors you will only get the zero vector, since the 2nd vector is just -1 times the first vector.

Draw a sketch of the plane and identify three points that you know are in the plane. From these three points, form two vectors that aren't parallel (or antiparallel, as are your two vectors).
 
Is there a way to find that point computationally without sketching?

Well, could I use the points (0,0,0), (1,1,0) and (2,0,2)? I got (2,0,2) by f(1).
 
Is that the process that should be done?
 
Loppyfoot said:
Is there a way to find that point computationally without sketching?
Maybe, but why would you want to handicap yourself by using only half of your brain on the problem?
Loppyfoot said:
Well, could I use the points (0,0,0), (1,1,0) and (2,0,2)? I got (2,0,2) by f(1).
Sure, those are all points in the plane. Now form two vectors and use them to get a third vector that is perpendicular to the plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K