Today I Learned

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Today I learned that cleaning a white hat can be done with bleach cleaner, but it’s important to rinse it before wearing it again. I also discovered that "oyster veneering," a woodworking technique from the late 1600s, is experiencing a minor revival despite its labor-intensive nature. Additionally, I learned that the factorial of 23 (23!) equals 25,852,016,738,884,976,640,000, which interestingly has 23 digits, a unique coincidence among factorials. I found out that medical specialists often spend less than 10 minutes with patients, and that watching TV can contribute to weight gain. Other insights included the fact that a kiss can transfer around 80 million microbes, and that bureaucracy can sometimes hinder employment opportunities. The discussion also touched on various trivia, such as the emotional sensitivity of barn owls and the complexities of gravitational lensing around black holes.
  • #4,771
fresh_42 said:
View attachment 317532If we meet, then LIGO can make a measurement.
I was not referring to the PF Singularity though, I was referring to the hidden USER menu in the mobile interface. There is no indication it is there until you happen to click it.

Edit: Actually, it is not just the mobile interface. Shrinking your browser width enough leads to the same effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #4,772
Orodruin said:
I was not referring to the PF Singularity though, I was referring to the hidden USER menu in the mobile interface. There is no indication it is there until you happen to click it.
Oh! We had this discussion recently and I commented: "I want to speak to the programmer!" so I missed the point.
 
  • #4,773
Orodruin said:
I was not referring to the PF Singularity though, I was referring to the hidden USER menu in the mobile interface. There is no indication it is there until you happen to click it.
Oh yes, there is an icon missing! @Greg Bernhardt was this not resolved recently?
 
  • #4,774
pbuk said:
Oh yes, there is an icon missing! @Greg Bernhardt was this not resolved recently?
I mean, not only is there a missing icon. It is displaced vertically and smaller than the other menu icons.
 
  • #4,775
Yeah, it's missing on my phone. But this is what it looks like on PC:
1669067811366.png
 
  • #4,776
  • #4,777
BillTre said:
This is a board game set in pre-WWI Europe.
Probably chosen to avoid the extra complications of nuke/chem/bio weapons... :wink:
 
  • #4,778
I'm not too surprised. I've thought about working on a similar program for a WW II game called Squad Leader starting with just a few types of units and minimal rules. That will have to wait until I retire. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes Mondayman and Drakkith
  • #4,779
berkeman said:
Probably chosen to avoid the extra complications of nuke/chem/bio weapons... :wink:
Sadly, you have to strike out chem in that list.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #4,780
fresh_42 said:
Sadly, you have to strike out chem in that list.
Yeah, I realized that after I posted...
 
  • #4,781
TIL: stonk, artillery fire? Don't remember learning that at Ft. Sill.
 
  • #4,782
Bystander said:
TIL: stonk, artillery fire? Don't remember learning that at Ft. Sill.
I believe this was slang mostly used by Canadians during WW2. I recall it from some of my books.
 
  • #4,783
Bystander said:
TIL: stonk, artillery fire? Don't remember learning that at Ft. Sill.
It was WWII era British army slang, I gather, although I don't know how widespread or long lasting.
 
  • #4,784
Ibix said:
It was WWII era British army slang, I gather, although I don't know how widespread or long lasting.
Stonking means good in English slang, a stonking good time!
 
  • #4,785
pinball1970 said:
Stonking means good in English slang, a stonking good time!
Yeah. My dad didn't like the phrase because he associated it with someone making fairly serious efforts to kill him. Like I say, I don't know how widespread the usage was.
 
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970
  • #4,786
Ibix said:
Yeah. My dad didn't like the phrase because he associated it with someone making fairly serious efforts to kill him. Like I say, I don't know how widespread the usage was.
WW2?

Yes after a search there are a lot of applications. Marbles (origin claimed there on one site) being drunk (Oz) stock market, Artillery fire and
Not a word you hear often in the UK, not North West anyway.
 
  • #4,787
pinball1970 said:
Stonking means good in English slang, a stonking good time!
I thought it meant stonks!

926e5009-c10a-48fe-b90e-fa0760f82fcd.png
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #4,788
Drakkith said:
I thought it meant stonks!

View attachment 317672
I had no idea of any of those other connections.
Including the stock market or darker military ones.

I put stonking with 'spiffing.' An Etonian, Wodehouse type of phrase.
"Everyone had an absolutely spiffing time."
 
  • #4,789
pinball1970 said:
WW2?
Yes - he'd've been 100 next year.

I agree it's not a common phrase these days in any context. I only learned of the artillery fire connotations because Comic Relief did a novelty single called "The Stonk" one year and my dad grumbled about it not sounding comical to him.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
  • #4,790
I told you not to mention the war. See where we got! It doesn't go away anymore. :cool:
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970
  • #4,791
fresh_42 said:
I told you not to mention the war. See where we got! It doesn't go away anymore. :cool:
I mentioned it once but I think I got away with it...
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and pinball1970
  • #4,792
Ibix said:
I mentioned it once but I think I got away with it...
I have such a feeling that it somehow should have changed, if outspoken, and did already, in reality, change to: Don't mention the Brexit!
 
  • #4,793
fresh_42 said:
I have such a feeling that it somehow should have changed, if outspoken, and did already, in reality, change to: Don't mention the Brexit!
Brexit is like the interpretations of Quantum Mechanics discussions. I read the threads that seem to follow the same lines but I come away from them with little recall or understanding of them.
 
  • #4,794
Cool looking water effects:

 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes mfb, DrClaude, epenguin and 7 others
  • #4,795

Musk’s Neuralink Hopes to Implant Computer in Human Brain in Six Months

The startup awaits implant approval while already working on curing paralysis

Elon Musk’s Neuralink Corp. aims to start putting its coin-sized computing brain implant into human patients within six months, the company announced at an event at its Fremont, Calif. headquarters on Wednesday evening.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-for-human-trials-approval-within-six-months

Who would be willing to undergo such an operation? . . .
 
  • #4,796
Germany and Costa Rica. New thread for the world cup?
 
  • #4,797
kyphysics said:
Who would be willing to undergo such an operation? . . .
People who greatly benefit from this technology.

6 months is far too optimistic, of course.
 
  • #4,798
mfb said:
People who greatly benefit from this technology.

6 months is far too optimistic, of course.
Yeah, I was merely thinking about risk factors. . .if I were paralyzed and could be "cured," I'd probably consider it. . .But, I wouldn't consider it if the surgery were meant to "enhance" my mental capabilities or something like that. . .at least, not without watching lots of other people do it first and observing the safety/side-effects/etc.
 
  • #4,799
Bull
 
  • #4,800
kyphysics said:
Yeah, I was merely thinking about risk factors. . .if I were paralyzed and could be "cured," I'd probably consider it. . .But, I wouldn't consider it if the surgery were meant to "enhance" my mental capabilities or something like that. . .at least, not without watching lots of other people do it first and observing the safety/side-effects/etc.
Sure, that's why the first patients will be paralyzed or have other very severe health conditions. As the technology improves we should see it being used for less serious conditions, until implants in healthy people might become an option.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 161 ·
6
Replies
161
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
338
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K