The discussion centers around the announcement of Tony Blair's resignation as Prime Minister of the UK, exploring reactions to his leadership, comparisons with other political figures, and speculations about his successor, Gordon Brown. The scope includes political opinions, personal sentiments, and reflections on Blair's legacy and policies.
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding Blair's legacy, his relationship with Bush, and the potential of Gordon Brown. No consensus is reached on these topics, indicating a variety of perspectives and interpretations.
Some discussions reflect assumptions about political affiliations and the implications of leadership changes, which may not be universally accepted. The conversation also highlights differing interpretations of Blair's policies and their impact on both domestic and international fronts.
Readers interested in political commentary, UK politics, leadership transitions, and the dynamics of international relations may find this discussion relevant.
chemisttree said:
only for the past two years or so-- it's about time if you ask me! Although, now we'll have to put up with Brown for a while. I think we should give Brown a chance though; he may actually be quite a good leader now he doesn't have to bow down to Blair's command.
Can't say I am sad about that. Now only if Bush would resign as well that would make a great week for the world.chemisttree said:
MeJennifer said:
add the entire Bush administration and it's a deal.MeJennifer said:
The reference has been Tony's long good-bye, and some wondering if Gordon Brown is up to the challenge.
We're connecting Astronuc.Astronuc said:add the entire Bush administration and it's a deal.
Shows how little you (the world) knows about Blair. He was/is more like Clinton than Bush, but he decided to side with a right wing republican neocon, to ensure the US weren't polarised, in their war.MeJennifer said:
Actually, I think Congress should resign enmasse also.MeJennifer said:We're connecting Astronuc.
It doesn't show that, it only shows how quickly you jump to conclusions.Anttech said:
Conclusions are based on what is written (well my conclusions are), and since you made the effort to link Blair and Bush I concluded you thought they stood for the same things, and thus you were happy Blair was leaving. At least now you will probably go and read up on Blairs policies and perhaps what he really stood for.MeJennifer said:It doesn't show that, it only shows how quickly you jump to conclusions.
Again, I fully agree with you.Astronuc said:
As I suspected you jumped to conclusions.Anttech said:
LOL.. Seems like you are jumping to conclusions if you think that was my thought process. I thought it was obvious why I concluded what I did, and no it wasnt due to my (evident) lack of IQ, and logic as your post was trying to show (right, or another jump?)
Please start... This is a thread about him!
I found the interview with Freedland to rather insightful into what to expect with Brown. Let us see if the expectations are correct. I am intrigued by the possibility that Brown really does have a good understanding of the US political system and policies. I wish the presidential candidates did - or maybe they do - and that's the problem.
I do have to wonder about the efficacy of Blair appointment to this role.Art said:
Sorry, we ran out of fish, so I used the first thing that washed up on the beach. lol It's to celebrate 6 months of posting with no banEvo said:Art went GOLD? When did this happen?
<WHAM>
Whacks Art with a man of war.
