Topology: ##\mathscr{T}_{2.5}\Rightarrow\mathscr{T}_2##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin_H
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the proof that every Urysohn space is a Hausdorff space, as explored in the context of an Introduction to Topology course using Fred H. Croom's "Principles of Topology." A Urysohn space is defined by the existence of neighborhoods around distinct points that do not intersect in their closures. The proof presented demonstrates that for any two distinct points in a Urysohn space, one can find open neighborhoods that are disjoint, thereby satisfying the Hausdorff condition. Feedback from peers suggests a more direct approach using open subsets of the closures to simplify the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Urysohn spaces and their properties.
  • Familiarity with Hausdorff spaces and separation axioms.
  • Knowledge of topological closures and open sets.
  • Basic proof techniques in topology.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Urysohn spaces in more depth.
  • Learn about various separation axioms in topology.
  • Explore examples of Hausdorff spaces and their characteristics.
  • Review proof techniques specific to topology, focusing on closure and neighborhood arguments.
USEFUL FOR

Students of topology, particularly those studying separation axioms, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between Urysohn and Hausdorff spaces.

Kevin_H
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The book I am using for my Introduction to Topology course is Principles of Topology by Fred H. Croom.

We are going over separation axioms in class when we were asked to prove that every Urysohn Space is a Hausdorff.

What I understand:
  • A space ##X## is Urysohn space provided whenever for any two distinct points of ##X## there are neighborhoods of ##U## of ##x## and ##V## of ##y## such that ##\overline{U}\cap \overline{V}=\emptyset.##
  • A space ##X## is Hausdorff if for any two distinct points of ##X## can be separated by open neighborhoods ##(x\in U,y\in V,U\cap V=\emptyset)##.
My rough attempt at proving this:
  • Given ##(X,\mathscr{T})## to be a Urysohn space, let ##x,y\in X## be distinct points. Then there are neighborhoods of ##U## of ##x## and ##V## of ##y## such that ##\overline{U}\cap \overline{V}=\emptyset##. We seek to prove there exists ##x\in B## open ##\subset X## and ##y\in A## open ##\subset X## such that ##A\cap B=\emptyset##. Consider ##X\setminus\overline{U}##. This is an open neighborhood of ##y##, thus there exists ##y\in A\subset\overline{A}\subset X\setminus\overline{U}##. Consider ##X\setminus \overline{A}##. This is an open neighborhood of ##x##, thus there exist ##x\in B\subset X\setminus\overline{A}.## Thus ##A\cap B=\emptyset##. QED.
Is my proof okay? Am I missing anything? Any suggestions? If you need me to clarify anything, please let me know. Thank you for taking the time to read this post. I greatly appreciate any assistance you may provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kevin_H said:
The book I am using for my Introduction to Topology course is Principles of Topology by Fred H. Croom.

We are going over separation axioms in class when we were asked to prove that every Urysohn Space is a Hausdorff.

What I understand:
  • A space ##X## is Urysohn space provided whenever for any two distinct points of ##X## there are neighborhoods of ##U## of ##x## and ##V## of ##y## such that ##\overline{U}\cap \overline{V}=\emptyset.##
  • A space ##X## is Hausdorff if for any two distinct points of ##X## can be separated by open neighborhoods ##(x\in U,y\in V,U\cap V=\emptyset)##.
My rough attempt at proving this:
  • Given ##(X,\mathscr{T})## to be a Urysohn space, let ##x,y\in X## be distinct points. Then there are neighborhoods of ##U## of ##x## and ##V## of ##y## such that ##\overline{U}\cap \overline{V}=\emptyset##. We seek to prove there exists ##x\in B## open ##\subset X## and ##y\in A## open ##\subset X## such that ##A\cap B=\emptyset##. Consider ##X\setminus\overline{U}##. This is an open neighborhood of ##y##, thus there exists ##y\in A\subset\overline{A}\subset X\setminus\overline{U}##. Consider ##X\setminus \overline{A}##. This is an open neighborhood of ##x##, thus there exist ##x\in B\subset X\setminus\overline{A}.## Thus ##A\cap B=\emptyset##. QED.
Is my proof okay? Am I missing anything? Any suggestions? If you need me to clarify anything, please let me know. Thank you for taking the time to read this post. I greatly appreciate any assistance you may provide.

The proof is ok. I might do a little more direct approach. If ##\overline U## is a neighborhood of ##x##, doesn't that mean that it contains an open set that contains ##x##? Why not just use that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kevin_H
Dick said:
The proof is ok. I might do a little more direct approach. If ##\overline U## is a neighborhood of ##x##, doesn't that mean that it contains an open set that contains ##x##? Why not just use that?

Thank You very much for the feedback. I was originally thinking of approaching it that way, but I wasn't sure if I was allowed to assume the closure had an open subset containing ##x##. Now that I know, I can assume both ##\overline{U}## and ##\overline{V}## have open neighborhoods containing their respective point, ##x\in B## and ##y\in A##. Since the closures are disjoint, then their open subsets should also be disjoint; satisfying the conditions for Hausdorff.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K