Topology Question (Normal Spaces)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BSMSMSTMSPHD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
BSMSMSTMSPHD
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Not sure where to put a question about topology, but I'll try here.

I'm trying to show that a certain topology for the Real line is not normal. The topology in question has no disjoint open sets (they are all nested) and therefore, no disjoint closed sets.

If a topology has no disjoint closed sets, can it still be normal? I'd say not, but the only definition I have for normal requires me to start with disjoint closed sets, which in this case is impossible.

Another possible approach... I've been able to show that the topology in question is not Hausdorff. Does that necessarily mean it is not normal?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to munkres, for normality 1 point sets must be closed.