Torque about an accelerating axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the computation of torque about an accelerating axis, specifically in the context of a car in free fall with its doors open. It concludes that the torque on the doors is effectively zero because both the doors and the car are accelerating uniformly, resulting in no net torque to close the doors. Furthermore, it clarifies that while angular momentum increases due to the velocity of points on the door, the absence of gravity in the car's frame negates any torque effect. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of choosing between inertial and non-inertial frames when applying Newton's laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and its calculation using the formula OP × F
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Concept of angular momentum and its relation to motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of fictitious forces in non-inertial reference frames
  • Learn about angular momentum conservation in various frames of reference
  • Explore the implications of free fall on mechanical systems
  • Investigate the role of centrifugal and Coriolis forces in rotating frames
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of systems in non-inertial frames and the application of torque in real-world scenarios.

tachyontensor
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How are torques computed about an axis when the axis (and the attached body) are both accelerating at the same rate? For example, if a car is in free fall with the doors open (with the rear end of the car pointing towards the ground) will the doors shut themselves due to torque? Or, is the torque zero because the axis and door(s) are moving uniformly?

Also, in a more general sense, if several objects are in the same accelerating reference frame, can a "pseudo" form of Newton's laws (adjusted for the fictitious forces) hold for all objects in the frame?

This isn't homework, just a curiosity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The torque about any point O due the force F acting through P is defined as OPXF. We use this all the time when studying the motion of wheels rolling down inclined planes etc. if O is the door hinge and P is any point on the door, then it may seem a bit counter intuitive to notice that the vector OP remains constant, since both P and O fall at the same rate, and therefore the torque is constant. However, the angular momentum about any instantaneously stationary horizontal axis passing through O is also increasing due to the increasing speed of the point P, and there is no contradiction.

The car door in your example will not swing shut since the whole car is in free fall, and effectively there is no gravity in the car frame.

In mechanical problems, in general we have to make one of the following choices:

1. Select an initial frame and consider only the “real” forces.
2. Select a non-inertial frame and consider not only the “real” forces, but suitably defined pseudo or fictitious forces.

In the falling car example, the addition of the force (–mg ) to a particle of mass m makes the frame compatible with Newton’s laws of motion. Another example is a rotating frame, where you have to take into account the centrifugal and the Coriolis forces, and then start to use Newton's laws again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K