Torque and equilibrium; concept problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
alpha372
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm just trying to understand why the force from net torque isn't included in net force when considering equilibrium: Why isn't the force from torque part of the net forces acting on a body?

Homework Equations


if net force = 0 and net torque = 0 then the body is in equilibrium;
net force = ma, torque = Frsin@, where @ is theta


The Attempt at a Solution


It seems like the force required for torque should be part of the net forces acting on the body.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Net force" is not a force, it's the sum of individual forces. You can certainly have forces acting on something so as to create a net torque, yet those same forces add up to zero net force. For example: a vertical force to the right of center and an equal but opposite vertical force to the left of center.

And you can also have a net force on a body with zero net torque.
 
Doc Al said:
"Net force" is not a force, it's the sum of individual forces.

Agreed.

Your example helped me:
You can certainly have forces acting on something so as to create a net torque, yet those same forces add up to zero net force. For example: a vertical force to the right of center and an equal but opposite vertical force to the left of center.

Thanks.

So from this I now believe that the force from the torque actually is considered in the net force acting on the object. Now I am starting to understand why both net force and net torque need to be included for equilibrium.
 
Last edited: