Torque Confusion: Understanding rxF and m_i*g*(x_i, y_i, z_i)

  • Thread starter Thread starter yetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of torque in the context of a particle system under the influence of gravity. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the definition of torque as \( t = r \times F \) and its application when calculating the torque of particles in a gravitational field, particularly in relation to finding the center of mass in three dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between torque and gravitational force, questioning how the torque expression applies when gravity is considered. The original poster attempts to reconcile the definitions and calculations presented in their textbook with their understanding of torque.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the calculation of torque in a gravitational field, suggesting that the torque can be expressed using the cross product of position and gravitational force. There is an ongoing exploration of how the net torque being zero relates to the equilibrium condition for the center of mass, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a potential inconsistency regarding the y-coordinate of torque calculations being zero, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the problem setup. The discussion also touches on the need for clarity regarding the conditions under which the center of mass is determined.

yetar
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On my book, the torque is defined as:
t = rxF
F is the a[llied force on a particle, r is the distance of the particle from the origin.
However, later on, the book tries to find the center of mass of a 3D particle system and says the torque of a particle is m_i*g*(x_i, y_i, z_i) when gravity is present.
However gravity is G=g*(0, -1, 0), so I don't see how the torque of the particle in gravity relates to rxF, because the y coordinate of the particle torque should be zero.

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

It is not clear for me where is emphasis of your question.
But i just know that:
If a particle with mass [tex]m_i[/tex] at [tex](x_i,y_i,z_i)[/tex] in the gravitational field of the question, then the torque respective to the origin is
[tex]m_i(x_i,y_i,z_i)\times g(0,-1,0) = m_ig(z_i,0,-x_i)[/tex]
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
Hope these helpful.


Regards
 
variation said:
Hello,

It is not clear for me where is emphasis of your question.
But i just know that:
If a particle with mass [tex]m_i[/tex] at [tex](x_i,y_i,z_i)[/tex] in the gravitational field of the question, then the torque respective to the origin is
[tex]m_i(x_i,y_i,z_i)\times g(0,-1,0) = m_ig(z_i,0,-x_i)[/tex]
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
Hope these helpful.


Regards

Ok, the purpose of what I read was to find the center of mass of the particle system.
This point needs to be the point that when some wedge is holding it, the particle system is in equilibrium. So the sum of the net Force is zero and also the sum of the net torque is zero.
From the sum of the net torque we get the center of mass.
But the problem is that the y coordinate of rxF for every force on every particle is zero.
And somehow from the equality of the sum of net torque equals to zero we get the center of mass?
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
I know what is a cross product and how to calculate it if that is what you ask.
 
Do you mean that how to use the net torque vanishes and find the position of center of mass ? If yes, then ...

For a rigid system composed of particles which have mass [tex]m_i[/tex] and position [tex]\mathbf{r}_i[/tex] respectively, a pivot is fixed on the center of mass and the net torque of the total system is zero (respective to the pivot or center of mass). Of course, the position of the center of mass is nuknown and we can assume it as [tex]\mathbf{x}[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\mathbf{N}=\sum_i(\mathbf{r}_i-\mathbf{x})\times m_i\mathbf{g}=0\quad\Rightarrow\quad\left(\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i\times\mathbf{g}\right)-\mathbf{x}\times\left(\sum_im_i\right)\mathbf{g}=0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow\quad\left(\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i\right)\times\mathbf{g}=\left(\sum_im_i\right)\mathbf{x}\times\mathbf{g}[/tex]
,where the uniform gravitational field is used. Because the arbitrariness of the [tex]\mathbf{g}[/tex] and one can conclude that [tex]\mathbf{x}=\frac{\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i}{\sum_im_i}[/tex].

Hope these helpful.


Goodluck
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K