# Total derivative formula nonsense

1. Dec 30, 2007

### mathboy

Total derivative formula confusion

It took me over an hour to fully resolve the confusion that appears in textbooks about the total derivate formula. Some textbooks use the term total derivative if a function f is a function t and other variables, and each of those variables themselves are functions of t. I'm going to challenge the formulas they give, including the first formula in this wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_derivative

Here is my refutation. Please tell me if I'm right or not.

#### Attached Files:

• ###### My Refutation.pdf
File size:
13.9 KB
Views:
87
Last edited: Dec 30, 2007
2. Dec 30, 2007

### malawi_glenn

What has this to do with homework?
The total derivative just follows from the chain rule:

$$\dfrac{d}{dt} \Phi (t,x(t),y(t),z(t)) = \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} \dfrac{d(t)}{dt} + \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \dfrac{dx}{dt} + \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y} \dfrac{dy}{dt} + \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z} \dfrac{dz}{dt}$$

3. Dec 30, 2007

### HallsofIvy

Staff Emeritus
I don't really see a "refutation" in that. The three definitions of "total differential" given in the Wikipedia article you cite are just three slightly different ways of phrasing the same definition.

4. Dec 30, 2007

### malawi_glenn

5. Dec 30, 2007

### mathboy

The textbooks should not teach with sloppy notations. It made me lose an hour of my homework time resolving something that shouldnt have been there in the first place (putting the exact same f on both sides of the equation).

Last edited: Dec 30, 2007
6. Dec 30, 2007

### malawi_glenn

How many textbooks have you constulted? And what kind? How could you spend one hour resolving that?

7. Jan 13, 2008

### CPL.Luke

the f should appear on both sides of th equation as your differentiating f, the partial and the derivative are two very different things.