Total energy of a damped oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total energy of a damped linear oscillator can be expressed as a function of time, E(t), which decays exponentially due to energy dissipation as radiation or heat. While the energy approaches zero, it never actually reaches it, meaning the oscillator theoretically continues indefinitely. Practically, the oscillator can be considered to have stopped when its amplitude is comparable to thermal noise. The time constant, calculated as sqrt(m/k), is crucial for determining when the motion is reduced to approximately 1% of its initial amplitude, typically after five time constants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of damped harmonic motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations
  • Knowledge of energy dissipation in mechanical systems
  • Concept of time constants in oscillatory systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differential equation for damped oscillators: M x'' + C x' + K x = 0
  • Learn about the calculation of time constants in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the differences between under-damped, over-damped, and critically damped oscillations
  • Investigate the relationship between amplitude decay and thermal noise in oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying mechanical systems or oscillatory motion, particularly those interested in energy dissipation and damping effects.

Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to express the total energy of a damped linear oscillator as a function of time? I'm confused here. I'd like to find E(t). As the oscillation is damped, dE/dt should everywhere be negative (energy being dissipated as radiation or heat). By setting E(t) equal to zero, shouldn't I be able to solve for the time at which the energy of the oscillating system is zero, and thus the time at which the system stops oscillating? And shouldn't this time be finite?

Is there another way to find the time at which the damped oscillator will stop oscillating?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The peak amplitude of the oscillation, that is, the envelope, decays exponentially. Since average or rms energy is related to the peak amplitude, it also decays exponentially. In theory it never exactly reaches zero so you can't say when the oscillator "stops." In practice you can say it stops when the amplitude is comparable to thermal noise or some other criterion. It is more common to specify the time constant, which is the time for the envelope to decay to 1/e of its initial amplitude.
 
Well... you can simlpy solve the differential equation for a damped oscillator, then use
E=\frac{1}{2}kx^2+\frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2
 
An ideal damped oscillator won't stop oscillating until infinite time has elapsed. However, practically the easiest way to find the time when the damped oscillator will top oscillating would be to determine the time constant, sqrt(m/k), and then multiply it by five because after five time constants the motion will be reduced to 1% (or something close to that) of its initial amplitude.
 
Signifier said:
As the oscillation is damped, dE/dt should everywhere be negative (energy being dissipated as radiation or heat).

The above posts are correct in saying the oscillation continues for ever, but dE/dt is not always negative.

Taking a mechanical damped oscillator for example, with equation of motion M x'' + C x' + K x = 0, the energy is dissipated by the the damper. The work is (force times velocity) = C x'^2. That is zero twice every cycle, when the velocity becomes zero.

If you evaluate E from tim_lou's equation you will get an exponential decay multiplied by a something looking like (A + B sin pt), which is a curve that "wobbles" around the "average" exponential decay in the energy.
 
Last edited:
BTW, when you consider the different solutions for under-damped, over-damped or critically damped oscillation, you get different solution.

I think there won't be any wobbling in the over-damped or critically damped cases.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K