Total Internal Reflection Confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of total internal reflection and the critical angle in optics, specifically addressing the misunderstanding of how the critical angle (\theta_{c}) relates to the index of refraction of glass. The critical angle is defined as the maximum angle of incidence for which total internal reflection occurs, and it cannot exceed the angle at which light transitions from a denser medium (glass) to a less dense medium (air). The participants clarify that while larger angles may still result in total internal reflection, they do not qualify as critical angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law and refraction
  • Knowledge of the concept of critical angle in optics
  • Familiarity with the index of refraction for different materials
  • Basic principles of light behavior at interfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Snell's Law and its applications
  • Study the relationship between critical angle and index of refraction
  • Explore practical applications of total internal reflection in fiber optics
  • Investigate the effects of varying incident angles on light behavior at boundaries
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching optics, and professionals in fields related to optical engineering or photonics will benefit from this discussion.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Initially,

\theta_{c} = 60^{o}

n_{glass}sin\theta_{c} = n_{air}

So,

n_{glass} = \frac{n_{air}}{sin\theta_{c}}

Now I would think that the incident angle from glass to air would be able to get LARGER and still remain critical because it would be less "head on" to the incident surface and thus less likely to refract through.

So if we assume, \theta_{c} can get larger and still remain critical then if we take and angle say,

\theta_{c} = 85^{o}

certainly,

n_{glass} = \frac{n_{air}}{sin\theta_{c}} < 1.15

because the value of the denominator is getting larger.

However they give c) as the correct answer. What am I misunderstanding?
 

Attachments

  • TIR.JPG
    TIR.JPG
    25.4 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
jegues said:
Now I would think that the incident angle from glass to air would be able to get LARGER and still remain critical because it would be less "head on" to the incident surface and thus less likely to refract through.
Think of it this way. Since the angle shown demonstrates total internal reflection, the critical angle must equal that or less. So that defines a minimum value for the index of refraction of the glass.

So if we assume, \theta_{c} can get larger and still remain critical then if we take and angle say,

\theta_{c} = 85^{o}
Surely a larger angle would still demonstrate total internal reflection, but that larger angle would not be the critical angle.
 
Doc Al said:
Think of it this way. Since the angle shown demonstrates total internal reflection, the critical angle must equal that or less. So that defines a minimum value for the index of refraction of the glass.


Surely a larger angle would still demonstrate total internal reflection, but that larger angle would not be the critical angle.

This is much more clear, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
976
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K