Total Work (Pumping Oil from a Tank).

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oil Tank Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work required to pump oil from a cylindrical tank, specifically a tank with a radius of 5 feet and a height of 15 feet, currently filled to a depth of 6 feet. The oil density is given as 50 lb/ft³. The correct approach involves integrating the weight of the oil over the varying heights, leading to the conclusion that the average height for the oil to be raised is 22 feet, resulting in a total work calculation of approximately 518,363 ft-lb. The discrepancy in the initial calculations arose from incorrect upper bounds in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with fluid mechanics concepts, including weight density.
  • Knowledge of geometric formulas for volume and area of cylinders.
  • Ability to perform dimensional analysis in physics problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of work and energy in fluid mechanics.
  • Learn about the application of integration in calculating work done by variable forces.
  • Explore the concept of average height in fluid dynamics problems.
  • Review examples of similar problems involving pumping fluids from tanks.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and mathematics, particularly those focused on fluid dynamics and calculus applications in real-world scenarios.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
"A fuel tank is an upright cylinder, buried so that its circular top is 10 feet beneath ground level. The tank has a radius of 5 feet and is 15 feet high, although the current oil level is only 6 feet deep. Calculate the work required to pump all of the oil to the surface. Oil weighs 50 lb/ft^3."

What I did was to first calculate the volume of the oil:

V=\pi r^{2}h=150\pi

Next, I calculated the mass of the oil:

150\pi*50=7500\pi

To figure out the total work, I integrated it with bounds from 0 to 25 because that is how far it would take to get it all to the surface:

\int_{0}^{25}7500\pi dx=187500\pi\approx 589049

The problem I have is that this isn't the answer my book has. It says the answer should be 518363. The only way I get that answer is by making the upper bound 22 rather than 25. Can anyone tell me why it is 22?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
What I did was to first calculate the volume of the oil:

V=\pi r^{2}h=150\pi
OK.
Next, I calculated the mass of the oil:

150\pi*50=7500\pi
That's the weight of the oil.

To figure out the total work, I integrated it with bounds from 0 to 25 because that is how far it would take to get it all to the surface:

\int_{0}^{25}7500\pi dx=187500\pi\approx 589049
I don't understand the logic of that integral. But the average height that the oil must be raised is 22 feet; so the work required is mgh = (weight)x(22 ft).
 
If you wanted to do this problem using integration, the integral would look like this:
\int_{19}^{25}\rho A x dx

where \rho is the weight density (given as 50 lb/ft^3), A is the cross-sectional area of the cylinder (\pi r^2), and "x" is the distance the oil needs to be raised. Note that oil at the bottom must be raised 25 ft, oil at the top only 19 ft.
 
So then the total work done would be the average of those integrals when x=19 and x=25?
 
This integral is more complicated then you might think. I would write it like this:

W = \int pAxdy

I chose y as the variable of integration to emphasize that you will need to make a substitution for "x" in terms of the height.

Jameson
 
I don't know what you mean by "average of those integrals". The range of the integral that I provided is from x = 19 to x = 25; it represents the range of heights that the oil must be raised.
 
Your mistake was calculating the total volume. The whole idea of calculus is dealing with infintessimally small changes, and what happens over those changes. In that same vein, these pumping problems are best thought of as adding the small amounts of work necessary to pump out infintessimally small "layers" of fluid. Think about the general case when the oil level is at any given height. What is the work required to lift THAT layer of liquid out?

Well:
What is the AREA of that extremely thin layer? A=\pi r^2. This never changes, so...what does?
What is the VOLUME of that extremely thin layer? dV=\pi r^2dh where dh is the infinitessimally small change in height.
What is the WEIGHT of that extremely thin layer? \rho=50 lb/ft^3, times the VOLUME = \rho dV = \rho \pi r^2 dh
What is the HEIGHT of that extremely thin layer? Well, that's what is changing, so that's what we need to integrate with respect to.

So W(h)=\int_{h_1}^{h_2}F(h)dh, and F=\rho A h

So W(h)=\int_{h_1}^{h_2}\rho A h{ }dh=\rho A\int_{h_1}^{h_2}h{ }dh

What are h_1 and h_2? h1 is the initial height, 15 foot tank - 6 foot level + 10 feet underground = 19. h2 is the final height, 15 full feet (tank is now empty) + 10 feet underground = 25.

Your final Integral is \rho \pi r^2 \int_{19}^{25} h{ }dh. Plug in your variables and you will get the answer you expect to get.
 
Last edited:
Very well written scholzie, the final integral is intended to be

\rho\pi r^2 \int_{19}^{25} h dh
 
whozum said:
Very well written scholzie, the final integral is intended to be

\rho\pi r^2 \int_{19}^{25} h dh


oops, didn't catch that. Thanks :)

edit: upon further inspection I made a few other typos... I think I got them all though.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K