Trajectory parametric equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a particle described by its position and velocity at specific times. The problem involves determining the particle's acceleration vector using parametric equations related to its trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of kinematic equations to find the acceleration vector. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about initial conditions, particularly the initial velocity, and the interpretation of the equations presented in the textbook.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion about the equations provided in the textbook, suggesting they may contain errors. Others clarify the steps taken to manipulate the equations to isolate variables, indicating a collaborative effort to understand the problem better. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the textbook's approach, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential assumptions regarding the initial velocity of the particle and question the derivation of specific terms in the equations, highlighting the need for clarity in the problem setup.

krisrai
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle is located at r=(2i+4j)m at t=0s.
At t=3s it is at r=(8i-2j)m and has velocity v=(5i-5j)m/s
a)what is the particles acceleration vector a?


Homework Equations


r1=r0+v0(t1-t0)+1/2a(t1-t0)^2
v1=v0+at


The Attempt at a Solution



v1=v0+at
(5i-5j)m/s=v0+a(3s-0s)
v0=(5i-5j)m/s-3a

this is where i have trouble:
I understand how my text uses this equation i just don't know were they got these numbers:
r1=r0+v0(t1-t0)+1/2a(t1-t0)^2
(4i-4j)m=(3s^2)a+(2s)vo

--> did they assume that r0=0? and how did they get r1?
and where did they get 2sv0 because from the information given i thought it was all 3seconds



okay well anyway i understand they would take the v0 found in the first part and sub it into get this:
(3s^2)a+ (2s)[(5i+5j)m/s - 3s(a)] =(4i+4j)m
and a=(2i+2j)m/s^2

Please can someone explain to me where they got the 2 from
and also i don't understand how they subtract3s(a)
I would really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relevant equations, you have written down the formulae for constant accn, which need not be the case here.

It is not mentioned explicitly, but presumably the velocity is 0 at t=0. If so, then,

v_avg = (r2-r1)/Δt = Δr/Δt. You know Δr.

Finding the avg accn is just one step from here.

(v, r2, r1, Δr are all vectors.)
 
The equations in the text's answer don't make sense to me either. They look like they're full of typos. I'd ignore them.
 
Hi krisrai,

The numbers from the text look right to me; they are just showing one step in solving the problem.

The velocity equation, with the numbers from the problem plugged in, are:

[tex] \begin{align}<br /> \vec v &= \vec v_0 +\vec a t \\<br /> (5\hat i - 5 \hat j) &= \vec v_0 + 3\vec a <br /> \end{align}[/tex]

and the displacement equation is:

[tex] \begin{align}<br /> \vec r &= \vec r_0 + \vec v_0 t + \frac{1}{2}\vec a t^2\\<br /> (8 \hat i - 2 \hat j) &= (2\hat i + 4\hat j) + 3\vec v_0 + \frac{1}{2}3^2 \vec a<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

So you have two equations, with two unknown ([itex]\vec v_0[/itex] and [itex]\vec a[/itex]) and you have to solve for them. What the book is doing, is, since there is a [itex]3\vec a[/itex] term in the velocity equation, is to manipulate the displacement equation to get a term of [itex]3\vec a[/itex]; that way you can easily solve the simultaneous equations.

So the displacement equation becomes:

combining [itex]\vec r[/itex] and [itex]\vec r_0[/itex]:
[tex] (6 \hat i - 6 \hat j) &=3\vec v_0 + \frac{1}{2}3^2 \vec a[/tex]

dividing by 3:
[tex] (2 \hat i - 2 \hat j) &=\vec v_0 + \frac{1}{2}3 \vec a[/tex]

and finally multiplying by 2:
[tex] (4 \hat i - 4 \hat j) &=2 \vec v_0 + 3 \vec a[/tex]
to get the result from your book.

So you can solve this last equation for [itex]3 \vec a[/itex], and plug it directly into the [itex]3 \vec a[/itex] term in the velocity equation. Then you have an equation with only one unknown [itex]\vec v_0[/itex] and you can find it's [itex]\hat i[/itex] and [itex]\hat j[/itex] values. Once you have that, you can plug it back into the velocity equation and find the acceleration [itex]\vec a[/itex]. What do you get?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K