Jet accelerating in problem with Constant Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a jet plane accelerating from an initial speed of 300 m/s to a final speed of 400 m/s over a distance of 4 km. Participants are tasked with determining the jet's acceleration using kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various kinematic equations to find acceleration, questioning the assumptions made about constant velocity and the calculation of time. There is an exploration of using average speed versus instantaneous speeds in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have recalculated their answers using different approaches and have noted discrepancies in results. There is ongoing exploration of which kinematic equations are appropriate for the given problem, with some guidance provided regarding the use of average speed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption of constant acceleration, and there is a recognition of the need to clarify how to calculate time and average speed in relation to the problem's parameters.

Caolan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A jet plane is cruising at 300 m/s when suddenly the pilot turns the engine up to full throttle. After traveling 4km, the jet is moving 400 m/s. What is the jet's acceleration?

known:
x0 = 0m, t0 = 0s, v0 = 300 m/s
x1 = 4000m, t1 = ?, v1 = 400 m/s


Homework Equations


t1 = x1 - x0 / v1 - v0
a = v1 - v0 / t1


The Attempt at a Solution


t1 = x1 - x0 / v1 - v0 = 4000m / 100 m/s = 40s
a = v1 - v0 / t1 = 100m/s / 40s = 2.5 m/s/s

The book says the acceleration is 8.8m/s/s. I have worked this problem several ways and cannot seem to come up with the solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Caolan said:
t1 = x1 - x0 / v1 - v0 = 4000m / 100 m/s = 40s
This reasoning is not correct. To find the time it took to cover those 4 km you need the average speed during that interval. Which is what? (For some reason, you used the change in speed.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
In solving for t1 you incorrectly assumed that the velocity was a constant 100 m/s.

Do you another kinematic equation for distance under a constant acceleration?
 
I assumed it was 100m/s because it starts off at 300 m/s and ends up at 400 m/s after 4000m and so the difference is 100 m/s. the other ones I have is the standard one:

x1 = x0 + v0(t1 - t0) + 0.5 * a(t1 - t0)^2. Substituting in the values I come up with:

4000 = 300(40) + 0.5 * a(40)^ = 4000 = 12000 + 0.5 * a * 1600
-8000 = 800*a
10 m/s/s = a.

Or I could use this one:
v1^2 = v0^2 + 2a * (x1 - x0)
400 ^ 2 = 300 ^ 2 + 2a * 4000)
160000 - 90000 = 8000a
70000 = 8000a

...

Okay I swear I did this several times... grrrr.

Thanks!
 
So my question now is how do I know which of the three kinematic equations to use? All three provide through algebraic methods the ability to find the acceleration? But I have gotten different answers from all three. The ciorrect answer being in the third one.
 
Caolan said:
I assumed it was 100m/s because it starts off at 300 m/s and ends up at 400 m/s after 4000m and so the difference is 100 m/s.
That's certainly the difference in speed, but that's not what you need to calculate the time. To calculate the time, you can use distance = ave speed * time, but first you need the average speed.

the other ones I have is the standard one:

x1 = x0 + v0(t1 - t0) + 0.5 * a(t1 - t0)^2. Substituting in the values I come up with:

4000 = 300(40) + 0.5 * a(40)^ = 4000 = 12000 + 0.5 * a * 1600
-8000 = 800*a
10 m/s/s = a.
This is wrong because you are assuming a time of 40 s, which is wrong.

Or I could use this one:
v1^2 = v0^2 + 2a * (x1 - x0)
400 ^ 2 = 300 ^ 2 + 2a * 4000)
160000 - 90000 = 8000a
70000 = 8000a
That's fine.
 
Caolan said:
So my question now is how do I know which of the three kinematic equations to use? All three provide through algebraic methods the ability to find the acceleration? But I have gotten different answers from all three. The ciorrect answer being in the third one.
Your only mistake was using this equation, which is not valid:
Caolan said:
t1 = x1 - x0 / v1 - v0
 
I recalculated it using the average and yes I was able to get 8.8 m/s^2 again. So is it safe to say that whenever you're given two velocities and asked to find something between that you should find the average and calc based on that?
 
Caolan said:
I recalculated it using the average and yes I was able to get 8.8 m/s^2 again. So is it safe to say that whenever you're given two velocities and asked to find something between that you should find the average and calc based on that?

Technically, these kinematics equations only work when you know the acceleration is constant. But for practical purposes, virtually all kinematics questions assume constant acceleration, so yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
awesome thank you!
 
  • #11
Caolan said:
So is it safe to say that whenever you're given two velocities and asked to find something between that you should find the average and calc based on that?
Well, it depends on what you need to calculate and how you plan to do it.

If you want to use a kinematic formula that involves the time, then you'll need to calculate the time. For that you can use Δx = vave*Δt.

A useful list of kinematic formulas can be found here: Basic Equations of 1-D Kinematics
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K