Transformation between Global and Local Coordinates for Uniform Bar Elements

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Folks,

The element equations for a uniform bar element with constant EA according to the attachment is given as

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &-1 &0 \\0
&0 &0 &0 \\-1
&0 &1 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\v^e_1
\\u^e_2
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\0\\F^e_2
\\0

\end{Bmatrix}##

I am just wondering, can this not be also written as

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &0 &0 \\0
&0 &0 &0 \\-1
&1 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\u^e_2
\\v^e_1
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\0\\F^e_2
\\0

\end{Bmatrix}##...?
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0125.jpg
    IMAG0125.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
You could do that, but things will get very confusing in the long run if the vector of displacements is in a different order to the vector of forces. For example the work done by the external forces will not be just ##F^T x## and the strain energy in the structure will not be ##(1/2)x^TKx##. You would need to keep track of the different order of the two vectors.

You could use a different consistent ordering of the variables, like

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &0 &0 \\
-1 &1 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\u^e_2
\\v^e_1
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\F^e_2
\\0\\0
\end{Bmatrix}##
 
OK thanks. Further on I am just wondering how he determined the transformations between the 2 sets of coordinates systems global ##(x,y)## and local ##(x_e,y_e)## based on the attachment.

He writes

##x_e=x \cos \theta_e+y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=-x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e##

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e- y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##

I would have written ##x_e=x \cos \theta_e-y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e## for ##(x_e,y_e)##

Then based on my above i write it in matrix form and get the inverse to arrive at

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e+y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=-x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##
(On the side, I would like to know how I would obtain ##(x,y)## graphically)
 
Last edited:
bugatti79 said:
OK thanks. Further on I am just wondering how he determined the transformations between the 2 sets of coordinates systems global ##(x,y)## and local ##(x_e,y_e)## based on the attachment.

He writes

##x_e=x \cos \theta_e+y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=-x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e##

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e- y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##

I would have written ##x_e=x \cos \theta_e-y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e## for ##(x_e,y_e)##

Then based on my above i write it in matrix form and get the inverse to arrive at

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e+y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=-x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##
(On the side, I would like to know how I would obtain ##(x,y)## graphically)

It is ok, I have it sorted. The book is correct. Cheers