Transformation between Global and Local Coordinates for Uniform Bar Elements

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transformation between global and local coordinate systems for uniform bar elements in the context of structural mechanics. Participants explore the formulation of element equations and the implications of different ordering of displacement and force vectors, as well as the mathematical transformations between coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formulation for element equations involving displacement and force vectors and questions if an alternative ordering could be used.
  • Another participant cautions that using a different order for displacement and force vectors could lead to confusion regarding work done and strain energy calculations.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about the derivation of transformations between global and local coordinate systems, providing their own proposed transformations.
  • Further discussion includes a participant's attempt to express the transformations in matrix form and derive inverse transformations, while also seeking graphical representation methods.
  • A later reply indicates that the original book's transformations are correct, suggesting resolution for that specific inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ordering of displacement and force vectors, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach. There is also a discussion about the correctness of the transformations, with one participant ultimately agreeing with the book's version, but earlier disagreements exist regarding the formulation.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of coordinate systems and the implications of different vector orderings are not fully explored. The discussion includes unresolved questions about graphical representation of the transformations.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Folks,

The element equations for a uniform bar element with constant EA according to the attachment is given as

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &-1 &0 \\0
&0 &0 &0 \\-1
&0 &1 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\v^e_1
\\u^e_2
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\0\\F^e_2
\\0

\end{Bmatrix}##

I am just wondering, can this not be also written as

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &0 &0 \\0
&0 &0 &0 \\-1
&1 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\u^e_2
\\v^e_1
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\0\\F^e_2
\\0

\end{Bmatrix}##...?
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0125.jpg
    IMAG0125.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 451
Engineering news on Phys.org
You could do that, but things will get very confusing in the long run if the vector of displacements is in a different order to the vector of forces. For example the work done by the external forces will not be just ##F^T x## and the strain energy in the structure will not be ##(1/2)x^TKx##. You would need to keep track of the different order of the two vectors.

You could use a different consistent ordering of the variables, like

##\displaystyle \frac{E_a A_e}{h_e}\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &0 &0 \\
-1 &1 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0 \\
0 &0 &0 &0
\end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix}
u^e_1\\u^e_2
\\v^e_1
\\ v^e_2

\end{Bmatrix}=\begin{Bmatrix}
F^e_1\\F^e_2
\\0\\0
\end{Bmatrix}##
 
OK thanks. Further on I am just wondering how he determined the transformations between the 2 sets of coordinates systems global ##(x,y)## and local ##(x_e,y_e)## based on the attachment.

He writes

##x_e=x \cos \theta_e+y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=-x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e##

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e- y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##

I would have written ##x_e=x \cos \theta_e-y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e## for ##(x_e,y_e)##

Then based on my above i write it in matrix form and get the inverse to arrive at

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e+y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=-x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##
(On the side, I would like to know how I would obtain ##(x,y)## graphically)
 
Last edited:
bugatti79 said:
OK thanks. Further on I am just wondering how he determined the transformations between the 2 sets of coordinates systems global ##(x,y)## and local ##(x_e,y_e)## based on the attachment.

He writes

##x_e=x \cos \theta_e+y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=-x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e##

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e- y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##

I would have written ##x_e=x \cos \theta_e-y \sin \theta_e##, ##y_e=x \sin \theta_e+y \cos \theta_e## for ##(x_e,y_e)##

Then based on my above i write it in matrix form and get the inverse to arrive at

##x=x_e \cos \theta_e+y_e \sin \theta_e##, ##y=-x_e \sin \theta_e+y_e \cos \theta_e##
(On the side, I would like to know how I would obtain ##(x,y)## graphically)

It is ok, I have it sorted. The book is correct. Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K