Transformation matrix of linear n-dimensional state-space system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transformation matrix P for a linear n-dimensional state-space system defined by the equation {\dot{\vec{{x}}} = {\bf{A}}{\vec{{x}}} + {\bf{B}}{\vec{{u}}}. The transformation matrix is constructed using the controllability matrix M_c and a secondary matrix M_2 derived from the characteristic equation |I\lambda -A|. The relationship is established as P^{-1} = M_c M_2, leading to the canonical form {\overline{\bf{A}}} = {\bf{PAP}}^{-1}. The user seeks clarification on the intuition behind this transformation process, particularly the role of M_2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly matrices and transformations.
  • Familiarity with state-space representation in control systems.
  • Knowledge of controllability and the controllability matrix M_c.
  • Ability to derive and interpret characteristic equations of matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of the controllability matrix M_c in detail.
  • Explore the canonical forms of state-space systems and their significance in control theory.
  • Learn about the implications of full rank in the context of controllability.
  • Investigate the role of characteristic equations in system stability and behavior.
USEFUL FOR

Control system engineers, linear algebra students, and anyone involved in the analysis and design of state-space systems will benefit from this discussion.

X89codered89X
Messages
149
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

I have a linear algebra question relating actually to control systems (applied differential equations)

for the linear system

[itex] <br /> {\dot{\vec{{x}}} = {\bf{A}}{\vec{{x}}} + {\bf{B}}}{\vec{{u}}}\\<br /> \\<br /> <br /> A \in \mathbb{R}^{ nxn }\\<br /> B \in \mathbb{R}^{ nx1 }\\[/itex]

In class, we formed a transformation matrix P using the controllability matrix [itex]M_c[/itex] as a basis (assuming it is full rank).
[itex] <br /> M_c = [ {\bf{B \;AB \;A^2B\;...\;A^{n-1}B}}][/itex]

and there is a second matrix with a less established name. Given that the characteristic equation of the system is [itex]|I\lambda -A| = \lambda^n + \alpha_1 \lambda^{n-1} +... + \alpha_{n-1}\lambda + \alpha_n= 0[/itex], we then construct a second matrix, call it M_2, which is given below.

[itex] {\bf{M}}_2 = <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \alpha_{n-1} & \alpha_{n-2} & \cdots & \alpha_1 & 1 \\<br /> \alpha_{n-2} & \cdots & \alpha_1 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> \vdots & \alpha_1 & 1 & 0 & 0\\<br /> \alpha_1 & 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0\\<br /> 1 & 0 & 0& \cdots & 0 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> [/itex]

then the transformation matrix is then given by

[itex] <br /> P^{-1} = M_c M_2<br /> [/itex]and then applying the transformation always gives.. and this is what I don't understand...

[itex] {\overline{\bf{A}}} = {\bf{PAP}}^{-1} = <br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \cdots & \vdots \\<br /> \vdots & \vdots & 0 & 1 & 0\\<br /> 0 & 0 & \cdots &0& 1\\<br /> -\alpha_{1} & -\alpha_{2} & \cdots & -\alpha_{n-1}& -\alpha_{n}\\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> [/itex]

Now I'm just looking for intuition is to why this is true. I know that this only works if the controllability matrix is full rank, which can the be used as a basis for the new transformation, but I don't get how exactly the M_2 matrix is using it to transform into the canonical form... Can someone explain this to me? thanks...All Right! I think I'm done editin LATEX ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Would I do better posting this somewhere else in PF?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K