Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Homework Help
Introductory Physics Homework Help
Transformation of Gravitational to Kinetic Energy
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="012anonymousx, post: 4587118, member: 448434"] I am not following the template for the reason that this is a generic question. Consider that the change in kinetic energy is 1J. Suppose further you have two particles, both of equal mass that are gravitationally attracted to each other (and the change in energy comes from the fact that they moved closer to each other -- these are planetary objects). What is their final velocity? Assume they start from rest. First thing to notice: their velocities will be exactly the same throughout. so (vf)^2 = (-vf)^2 = vf So two approaches: dk = (1/2)(m)(v^2) Rearrange for v and divide by two because the velocity "splits" into two for both the masses. You will find a factor of root 2 over 2. Approach two: dk = (1/2)(m)(v^2) + (1/2)(m)(v^2) = m v^2. Rearrange for v. Here we have no need for dividing by two, we straight up get the v. This v has no factor infront of it. It is just root of (dk/m). So two contradicting pieces. The first approach is in fact correct. I have confirmed it. Can someone point out the flaw in the logic of the other piece? [EDIT] Okay I found one mistake in my reasoning: The change in energy is for the system. I should mention that. So the way I got it was 2 *(Gm^2/r), r is the distance between their centres. Multiply by two for both. So the change in kinetic energy of the SYSTEM is actually: (1/2)(2m)(2*vf)^2. Wait... no okay, I got it! vf of the system has to remain the same. Makes no sense if it changed by conservation of energy. Thanks for letting me write. I was stuck on this problem for a while! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Homework Help
Introductory Physics Homework Help
Transformation of Gravitational to Kinetic Energy
Back
Top