Transformer question: 50Hz versus 60Hz

  • Thread starter Thread starter jojo13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the operation of transformers designed for 60 Hz when supplied with a 50 Hz input, focusing on the implications of voltage and frequency ratios, core saturation, and magnetic flux considerations. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of transformer functionality in different frequency environments.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a transformer designed for 60 Hz can operate on a 50 Hz supply if the voltage is adjusted according to the V/Hz ratio, suggesting that the voltage at 50 Hz must be 20% lower than at 60 Hz.
  • Others argue that the relationship can be expressed mathematically as V50 = 5/6 * V60, indicating that the 50 Hz voltage should be 83% of the 60 Hz voltage.
  • A participant mentions that a 50 Hz transformer can handle the same voltage at 60 Hz, presenting a different perspective on transformer operation across frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about core saturation and heating, with a participant explaining that using a 60 Hz transformer at 50 Hz without reducing voltage could lead to excessive magnetizing current and overheating.
  • Another participant notes that core loss is also affected by frequency, suggesting that using a 50 Hz transformer on a 60 Hz line could increase core heating by 20% due to the same flux swing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the operation of transformers across different frequencies, particularly concerning voltage adjustments and the implications for core saturation and heating. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best approach or understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical relationships and physical principles, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the specific conditions under which transformers can operate across different frequencies. The discussion includes both theoretical and practical considerations without definitive conclusions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to electrical engineers, students studying electromagnetism, and professionals working with power systems who seek to understand transformer behavior under varying frequency conditions.

jojo13
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Will a transformer with 60 Hz being fed to a 50 Hz supply work?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The transformer flux capability is related to the ratio, V/Hz. So for a given voltage rating at 60 Hz, the capability at 50 Hz will be 20% lower, or I mean the voltage at 50 Hz has to be 20% less than the 60 Hz voltage.

So you can't operate with the same voltage rating on 50 Hz as you have at 60 Hz or the core will saturate.

A common 60 Hz voltage is 480 V. That gives you a V/Hz ratio of 8. A common 50 Hz voltage is 400 V, which gives you the same result, so you can use a 480 V 60 Hz transformer on a 50 Hz system if the voltage is 400 V.
 
a transformer designed for 60 Hz can be supplied by 50 Hz as long as the V/Hz ratio is preserved.

In other words, V60/60 = V50/50

where V60 is the 60 Hz voltage and V50 is the 50 Hz voltage

To preserve the ratio, V50 = 5/6 * V60

so the 50 Hz voltage has to be 83% of the 60 Hz value.Going the other way, a transformer designed for 50 Hz will have the result

V60 = 6/5 * V50

or - 1.2 * V50

So a 50 Hz transformer can definitely handle the same voltage at 60 Hz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jojo13

Ahh I get it. So no matter what, a 50 Hz can be fed to a 60 Hz
 
Last edited:
Correct!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jojo13
jojo13 said:
Ahh I get it. So no matter what, a 50 Hz can be fed to a 60 Hz

What is your background, @jojo13? Have you had calculus yet ?

@magoo gave the correct answer.
The why behind it is

A transformer core is sized to carry the magnetic flux necessary to support the voltage you're going to impress on its windings.
Since in any inductor the relation between volts and flux is a derivative-integral one,
volts = -number of turns X d(flux)/d(time) ... or flux = 1/n X ∫volts X d(time)
volts per turn is a measure of the rate of change of flux in the inductor

It is most easily visualized with a square wave voltage

core50ACsq_wav2annotated.jpg


As the equations show, the integral volt-seconds is a measure of the magnitude of that flux at any instant.
See that flux increases while voltage is positive and decreases while it's negative? That's Mother Nature at work doing real world integrating. Maths Rule !

Okay, so the longer voltage stays positive the higher flux rises.And vice versa.
On a 60 hz power system voltage stays positive for 8.33 milliseconds, a half cycle With a 100 volt square wave that'd be 0.833 volt-seconds.
On a 50 hz power system voltage stays positive for 10 milliseconds. With a hundred volt wave that'd be 1 volt second.
Some power inductor datasheets give the volt-second rating.

Point is the core must be large enough to hold all that flux.
If it's not , excessive magnetizing current will flow trying to force more flux through a core that's already full. That heats both the iron core and the copper windings. You'll hear the core 'buzz' from magnetorestriction.

here's a picture i drew for another thread some years ago..
This core is "full of flux" at the orange line.
Pushing flux all the way up to the required volt-seconds requires excessive magnetizing current and will soon overheat that inductor.

core50ACsq_wav4.jpg


I hope that plants the basic idea and sparks an interest in inductance for you.

Train your brain to think in terms of derivative-integral relationships. Mother Nature loves them and it'll help you appreciate the magnificent world she's built around us..

Now in a power system you'll have sine waves not square.
Derivative of sine is cosine which has same shape , so it is not obvious by just looking that integration-differentiation is at play.
That's why i prefer to explain with square and triangle waves it makes it obvious to the eye.
Here's a 'scope trace of a real inductor with triangle wave current forced through it(top trace) - observe voltage is almost square(bottom trace).
That core was rather a poor one hence the rounded corners on the voltage wave

triangle_current_sec_volts3HZonly.jpg
Here's an image of a transformer's current when it enters saturation. That could happen from using a 60 hz transformer at 50 hz if you don't decrease applied voltage. (image courtesy of https://www.rane.com/note159.html check it out )
upload_2018-8-26_9-34-18.png


Observe current peaks not at voltage peak , but after it when volt-seconds reach the limit of the core.
That transformer will soon be in trouble. I guarantee it's buzzing.

I hope the above long, non-mathematical tome helps someone 'see the light'. That 'scope trace was an "AHA! moment" for my technician and me.
When your intuition leads you to the same formula that's in your textbook it's the start of real understanding.

old jim
 

Attachments

  • core50ACsq_wav2annotated.jpg
    core50ACsq_wav2annotated.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 1,034
  • core50ACsq_wav4.jpg
    core50ACsq_wav4.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 960
  • triangle_current_sec_volts3HZonly.jpg
    triangle_current_sec_volts3HZonly.jpg
    34.5 KB · Views: 983
  • upload_2018-8-26_9-34-18.png
    upload_2018-8-26_9-34-18.png
    25.4 KB · Views: 1,182
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, Fisherman199, Baluncore and 5 others
Thanks Old Jim. We all love learning from you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fisherman199, davenn and jim hardy
Thanks @anorlunda

if i can help somebody relate those erudite derivations in their textbooks to the physical goings on it is worthwhile.

Thank you guys for tolerating this math challenged old fossil.

old jim

ps - viva Faraday !
 
jim hardy said:
ps - viva Faraday !

viva Steinmetz!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #10
I agree with those comments, Old Jim. You add a lot of meat to the bones!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and dlgoff
  • #11
jojo13 said:
Ahh I get it. So no matter what, a 50 Hz can be fed to a 60 Hz
Keep in mind core loss is also affected, so putting a 50Hz transformer on a 60Hz line with the same flux swing will result in 20% increase in core heating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K