Transition states of electron in atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transitions of electrons in atoms, particularly focusing on the behavior of electrons in neutral and ionized atoms when energy is applied. Participants explore concepts related to energy absorption, excited states, and the implications of thermodynamics on these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether electron transitions occur only in neutral atoms and what happens in ionized atoms.
  • Another participant asserts that ions can absorb energy as well.
  • There is a discussion about the thermodynamic principle that systems tend to move towards lower energy states, which some participants reference to explain why excited electrons return to ground states.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the need for electrons to transition back to lower energy states despite having absorbed energy.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the difference between energy absorption (via photons) and charge transfer in chemical reactions, emphasizing that absorbing energy does not equate to gaining or losing charge.
  • Participants discuss the conditions under which an ionized atom might become neutral, with one suggesting that high energy could lead to charge production, while another counters that this is not how ionization works.
  • There is a question about the reversibility of the ionization process, indicating further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the thermodynamic principle that systems seek lower energy states, but there is disagreement regarding the implications for ionized atoms and the processes involved in charge transfer and energy absorption.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the relationship between energy absorption and charge transfer, and the discussion reveals a lack of consensus on how these processes interact in neutral versus ionized atoms.

astro2cosmos
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
as we know when a particular energy is given to a neutral atom an electron from ground state jump to upper state (absorbing the energy). and that excited electron after sometime by releasing energy jump again to its ground state.
my confusion is that firstly does this transition of electron occurs only in neutral atom, what happen if the atom is ionsed one? , secondly why there is need to jump from excited state to ground state since the electron has more energy than ealrier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, ions absorb as well.

Second question.. Um, basic thermodynamics?
 
alxm said:
Yes, ions absorb as well.

Second question.. Um, basic thermodynamics?

what from "basic thermodynamics" to jump ?
 
Basic thermodynamics: Things tend to go towards lower energy. Your post seemed to imply the opposite.
 
alxm said:
Basic thermodynamics: Things tend to go towards lower energy. Your post seemed to imply the opposite.

ok.
so does it apply to ionized atom also means since an ionized atom need to release or absorb an electron to become neutral, so if we provide energy to that ionized atom than it should absorb that and by doing so Can that atom become neutral?
 
You're confusing absorbing energy (in the form of a photon) with gaining charge, by trasnfer of electrons in a chemical reaction.

In absorption, a photon provides energy only, but no charge. An electron can absorb the energy and go to an excited state, but unless you're talking about a high energy photon like an x-ray, the electron doesn't leave the atom. No charge is transferred. A neutral atom is still neutral, and an ion is still an ion.

Charge transfer is a totally different process. You shouldn't say that an ion needs to release or "absorb" an electron to become neutral, because that confuses things. In that case, the electron just needs to transfer, it doesn't need to absorb any energy.
 
johng23 said:
You're confusing absorbing energy (in the form of a photon) with gaining charge, by trasnfer of electrons in a chemical reaction.

In absorption, a photon provides energy only, but no charge. An electron can absorb the energy and go to an excited state, but unless you're talking about a high energy photon like an x-ray, the electron doesn't leave the atom. No charge is transferred. A neutral atom is still neutral, and an ion is still an ion.

Charge transfer is a totally different process. You shouldn't say that an ion needs to release or "absorb" an electron to become neutral, because that confuses things. In that case, the electron just needs to transfer, it doesn't need to absorb any energy.

ok. but my confusion is still for:
why there is need to jump from excited state to ground state since the electron has more energy than earlier? it is only because of what above thermo. said? or anything else?
 
It's like the previous poster said, basic thermo. Systems always seek the lowest energy state.

I'm not sure what gave you the opposite idea, but if you know what it is, you should post it because that's an important issue to get straight.
 
johng23 said:
It's like the previous poster said, basic thermo. Systems always seek the lowest energy state.

I'm not sure what gave you the opposite idea, but if you know what it is, you should post it because that's an important issue to get straight.

my thought is that when we apply a very high energy to an ionised atom can there is any probability of production of charge so that this ion become a neutral one?
is there any way to transfer an ion to neutral atom by any way by suppling any form of energy?
 
  • #10
It doesn't really work that way. You can ionize an atom with high energy - if you provide enough energy that the electrons' kinetic energy is greater than their binding energy, they will escape the atom. You can only remove electrons that way though, so you can't make an ionized atom neutral.
 
  • #11
johng23 said:
It doesn't really work that way. You can ionize an atom with high energy - if you provide enough energy that the electrons' kinetic energy is greater than their binding energy, they will escape the atom. You can only remove electrons that way though, so you can't make an ionized atom neutral.

can this process be reverisible?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
983
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K