Transmission of blue light through ceramics and surface roughness effects

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transmission of blue light (350-550nm) through lithium disilicate ceramics using an Ulbricht ball and a spectrometer, with a LED dental curing unit as the light source. It was established that increased surface roughness leads to lower light transmission. Interestingly, applying a thin film of immersion oil (refractive index 1.51) resulted in a 3% decrease in transmission, contrary to expectations of improved transmission due to reduced reflection. This phenomenon is attributed to thin film interference effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light transmission principles
  • Familiarity with lithium disilicate ceramics
  • Knowledge of spectrometry techniques
  • Basic concepts of thin film interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of surface roughness on light transmission in ceramics
  • Study thin film interference in optical materials
  • Explore the properties of immersion oils and their applications in optics
  • Investigate the impact of different light sources on ceramic transmission
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for materials scientists, dental professionals, and optical engineers interested in the optical properties of ceramics and the effects of surface treatments on light transmission.

ccdani
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey :)

I measured the transmission of blue visible light (350-550nm) through lithiumdisilicate ceramics with an ulbricht ball and an spectrometer. The light source was a led dental curing unit (bluephase style). The light guide was positioned direct on the ceramics.
Now I wanted to test different surface conditions. The transmission was lower when the roughness of the ceramic is higher. Then I tested the transmission with a thin film of immersion oil (refractive index 1.51) between the light guide and the ceramics. I thought that the degree of transmission has to be higher because of the lower reflection on the surface.
But it was 3% lower. I thought that there is less reflection at the surface with immersion oil because of the similar refractive index of immersion oil than of air.
Can you explain this phenomenon? Is it because of thin film interference?

Thank you very much!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Did you try this on both rough and smooth surfaces? Was the decrease in the degree of transmission consistent for both?
 
I've tried it on both (also glasured ceramics) also on other thicknesses. When I measured the same thickness there was the same decrease of Transmission. The higher the thickness the lower is the difference between with immersion oil or with no Immersion oil.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K