Trapezoidal Approximation Error

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate number of subintervals (N) for trapezoidal approximation to achieve a specific accuracy. The consensus suggests using N = 20 to ensure the error is less than 0.005 for two decimal place accuracy. Participants debate whether to use "<" or "≤" in their calculations, with a recommendation to use "<" for clarity. The approach to achieving the desired accuracy is confirmed as correct. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in mathematical approximations.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


qFkVv.png


The Attempt at a Solution


rdqgf.jpg

Thus my answer is N = 20.

I wasn't sure if I should use ≤ or just <. Also to get 2 decimal place accuracy would using 0.005 be correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theBEAST said:

Homework Statement


qFkVv.png


The Attempt at a Solution


rdqgf.jpg

Thus my answer is N = 20.

I wasn't sure if I should use ≤ or just <. Also to get 2 decimal place accuracy would using 0.005 be correct?

Your work looks fine to me, but I think I would use < instead of ≤. If your error < .005, you'll be guaranteed 2 decimal place accuracy.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K