Travel 7 Light Years at 50000km/s - How Long?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time required for a journey of 7 light years (LY) at a speed of 50,000 km/s, which is approximately 1/6th the speed of light (c). Participants confirmed that the journey would take about 42 years from the perspective of Earth, with relativistic effects being minimal at this speed. The gamma factor for this speed is approximately 1.014, indicating a negligible difference between Earth time and spaceship time. For faster speeds, such as 0.8c, the gamma factor increases significantly, affecting travel time more dramatically.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and time dilation
  • Familiarity with the gamma factor formula: γ = 1/(sqrt(1-v²/c²))
  • Basic knowledge of light year (LY) as a unit of distance
  • Concept of constant speed versus acceleration in space travel
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relativistic speeds on time dilation
  • Explore online calculators for relativistic travel time calculations
  • Study the effects of constant acceleration on interstellar travel
  • Learn about the physics of gravitational time dilation in space missions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physicists, and anyone interested in the practicalities of interstellar travel and the effects of relativistic speeds on time perception.

Spockishere
Messages
12
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I'm intrigued to hear your answers on this one.
let's say i would like to drop by one of my pals on a certain planet, 7ly away. I got to 42 years but it doesn't really sound correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just tried an other formula and got 1 year, I'm lost haha.
 
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Can you show us your calculation that got you to 42 years? Did you assume any acceleration/deceleration times, or just simplified it to that speed for the whole trip?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Spockishere said:
Summary: I'm intrigued to hear your answers on this one.

let's say i would like to drop by one of my pals on a certain planet, 7ly away. I got to 42 years but it doesn't really sound correct.
That speed is about ##\frac c 6##. So, yes, about ##42## years. Although a little less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
You're going at 1/6th the speed of light w/r to the target. At that velocity, the relativistic corrections are on the order of 1%. They're pretty much irrelevant. So the answer actually is just about six times seven = 42 years. Minus maybe half a year.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: David Lewis, Ibix and PeroK
Thanks for the answers guys.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Can you show us your calculation that got you to 42 years? Did you assume any acceleration/deceleration times, or just simplified it to that speed for the whole trip?
Thanks for the warm welcome! I used this formula ( 1/(sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)). And i just simplified it to one constant speed for the whole trip.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Spockishere said:
Thanks for the warm welcome! I used this formula ( 1/(sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)). And i just simplified it to one constant speed for the whole trip.
That's the one! It's the gamma factor. But, for ##v = \frac c 6##, we have:
$$\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{35}{36}}} \approx 1.014$$Which is not very significantly different from ##1## and implies only a ##1.4 \%## difference between Earth time and spaceship time for the journey.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Spockishere said:
Summary: I'm intrigued to hear your answers on this one.

but it doesn't really sound correct.

Out of curiosity, why were you doubting the results? IMO, actually doing some math before posting a question puts you in pretty exclusive club. ;-)
 
  • #10
Grinkle said:
Out of curiosity, why were you doubting the results? IMO, actually doing some math before posting a question puts you in pretty exclusive club. ;-)
I wasn't really doubting the results, i just hoped they were wrong. I was curious as to how a space voyage would feel like at those distances. 42 years is a lot haha. And thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #11
Spockishere said:
I wasn't really doubting the results, i just hoped they were wrong. I was curious as to how a space voyage would feel like at those distances. 42 years is a lot haha. And thanks.
Even at ##0.5c## the gamma factor is only about ##1.15##. That's still not very significant. You need to get up to ##0.8c## where the gamma factor is ##1.67## to make a real difference.

Interstellar space travel is never going to be easy.
 
  • #12
Spockishere said:
I wasn't really doubting the results, i just hoped they were wrong. I was curious as to how a space voyage would feel like at those distances. 42 years is a lot haha. And thanks.
But you are better than Apollo 12 and Apollo 13. They even needed ##0.5 ms## more from relativistic effects, mainly gravitational time-dilation.

Source:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720022040
 
Last edited:
  • #13
However at constant 1G acceleration then decelleration you could make the 7 LY trip in a little over 4 years ship time, but would hit a top speed of 0.97c

there are a number of calculators online for this
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
706
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K