Triangle Inequality and Cauchy Inequality Proofs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving Cauchy's Inequality and the Triangle Inequality within the context of an elementary linear algebra class, specifically without the use of inner products. Participants are exploring both algebraic and geometric proofs for these inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss algebraic proofs and express difficulty in visualizing geometric interpretations. Some attempt to relate the dot product to cosine and projections, while others question how to represent numerical values geometrically. There are suggestions to use diagrams and projections to aid understanding.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored. Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to visualize the inequalities, while others continue to seek clarity on the geometric aspects of the proofs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the requirement to avoid inner products and the need for both algebraic and geometric proofs. There is also a focus on how to represent numerical values geometrically, which remains a point of confusion.

jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


The question says to find a proof for Cauchy's Inequality and then the Triangle Inequality.

This is an elementary linear algebra class I'm doing, so I can't use inner products or anything.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I got the proofs using algebra, but I'm having trouble seeing them geometrically. I want to draw a picture for Cauchy's Inequality but can't quite visualize it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: Misread the question. Seems like you are supposed to find both the algebraic and geometric proof for both the inequalities.
 
Yeah, that's the way I read it too.

But my proof for the first one is just that | A dot B| / (|A| dot |B|) = cos(x), and cos(x) ≤ 1, so |A dot B| ≤ |A| dot |B|.

Given the definitions we got for this class, I don't see any way to prove this differently, unless I use inner products. I run into the same problem with the other proof.
 
| A • B | ≤ |A| |B|
Algebraic: you’re right since cos is bound between 0 and 1 this shows this inequality must be true.
Geometric: Think about what the dot product represents on a graph. It’s magnitudes of one vector projected onto another.


| A + B| ≤ |A| + |B|
Algebriac: Hint: Add |-a| <= a <= |a| and |-b| <= b <= |b|
Geometric: This just means that no one leg of a triangle can be longer than the other two put together.
 
For the geometric proof of | A • B | ≤ |A| |B|,

I can use that Bcos(x) = (B dot A) / |A| = B dot n, where n is a unit vector in the direction of A. That's a projection.

By definition n = A / |A|, so B dot (A / |A|) = Bcos(x) --> B dot A = ABcos(x), but that just brings me back to the proof I did first, so is it really any different?
 
IMHO that's more of an algebraic proof. In this context I think geometric means proof by picture rather than from the axioms of geometry.
 
I guess I'm having trouble seeing how you can prove it using a picture.

I was trying to use a picture similar to the one on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dot_Product.svg

But since |A dot B| and |A||B| are numbers, how can you show them on the diagram?
 
What geometric shape would be represented |A||B|?
What is geometricly represented by that picture.
 
The picture geometrically represents the projection of A onto B, and that projection is A dot B. Is that right?

But |A||B| is a number, how can it have a geometric interpretation?
 
  • #10
Don’t over think it, If I asked you to draw a picture of 3*5, or maybe build it with blocks, how would you do it?
 
  • #11
A vector with length 15?

But how would you know which direction the vector would point?
 
  • #12
Don't think of |A|*|B| in terms of vectors, |A|*|B| is just some number, |A| is just some number, |B| is just some number. Who cares where we got them from.

How do they teach little kids to understand multiplication? They always compare it to some shape.

Now ask your self could the projection of A onto B ever be larger than that shape?
 
  • #13
A groups of B things?
 
  • #14
3*5 is often represented as a rectangle of height 3 length 5.
 
  • #15
Ah, I see it now. The rectangle describing |A dot B| will always have a smaller width than the other one, because the projection of B on A is smaller than B itself.

Unless the angle is zero, in which case they're equal. Thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K