B Triboelectric charging vs charging by conduction

AI Thread Summary
Rubbing two objects together generates a different result than mere contact due to the mechanical work involved in charge transfer. When objects are rubbed, they increase their contact area and create physical distortions, facilitating greater charge transfer. In contrast, simply bringing objects together involves minimal work and limited contact points at a microscopic level. This limited interaction results in only a small amount of charge transfer. Therefore, the process of rubbing enhances both the area of contact and the effectiveness of charge transfer.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Why does rubbing two objects together produce a different result than having them contact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
versine said:
Why does rubbing two objects together produce a different result than having them contact?
I think there are to things at work here. Firstly, transferring charge requires Work to be done. In this case, it's actual mechanical work. Bringing two objects together involves less work than rubbing them together. Also, two objects, even described as flat are not actually flat; there will be very few touching points on a microscopic scale. Just bringing them together will, perhaps cause some small amount of charge transfer across those small areas. Rubbing will increase the total contact area over time and physical distortion (= work) of the surfaces will also cause charge transfer.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Problems I Have With Electrostatics and Pith Ball Experiments
Replies
10
Views
4K
B Basic questions regarding theory of electrical capacitance
Replies
11
Views
1K
Electrical conductivity has an effect while charging by conduction?
Replies
7
Views
1K
B Can charges move without a field? How charges redistribute without it?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I How to measure average thermal conductivity of a metallic material?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Does the Electric Field Change When One Charge Moves Relative to Another?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Magnetic field when the area of the plates of a capacitor increases
Replies
7
Views
1K
B Conductors in the triboelectric series
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Initiation and the math behind Arc Discharges
Replies
8
Views
1K
I DC current flows in a wire when two loops are brought close by?
Replies
14
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top