Trig functions on complex numbers?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the behavior of trigonometric functions when applied to complex numbers, particularly focusing on expressions like sin(4i+3) and the implications of extending these functions beyond real arguments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether trigonometric functions are undefined for complex numbers or if there is an established behavior for them.
  • Another participant explains that the arguments for sin(x) and cos(x) are not limited to angles and provides the Euler's formula as a basis for extending these functions to complex arguments.
  • It is noted that for a complex argument like 4i+3, the cosine and sine can be expressed in terms of exponential functions, leading to specific formulations involving real and imaginary components.
  • A suggestion is made to consider hyperbolic trigonometric functions, indicating that substituting an imaginary unit in the argument of sine or cosine relates to hyperbolic sine and cosine functions.
  • A mathematical identity for sin(x+iy) is presented, showing its relation to sine and hyperbolic functions, further illustrating the extension of trigonometric functions into the complex domain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various perspectives on the extension of trigonometric functions to complex numbers, with no consensus reached on the implications or definitions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the treatment of these functions.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions, as well as the assumptions made when extending these functions to complex arguments. Unresolved mathematical steps are also present in the derivations provided.

davee123
Messages
671
Reaction score
4
Out of curiosity, what happens when you try to perform a trig function on a complex number? So, say, sin(4i+3)? Is this undefined since angles are only capable of being real numbers, or is there an agreed behavior for complex numbers?

DaveE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even in terms of real numbers, the arguments for the functions sin(x) and cos(x) are NOT assumed to be angles!

Do you know that eix= cos(x)+ i sin(x)?

Then you also know that ex+ iy= ex(cos(y)+ i sin(y))
Of course, then ex- iy= ex(cos(y)- i sin(y))

We can, from those same formulas, derive
cos(x)= (eix+ e-ix)/2 and
sin(x)= (eix- e-ix)/(2i)
While those are derived, originally, with x real, we can easily extend them as definitions for functions of complex x.

In particular, if x= 4i+ 3, then
cos(4i+3)= (e-4+ 3i+ e4- 3i)/2
= (e-4(cos(3)+ i sin(3))+ e4(cos(3)- i sin(3))
= (e-4+ e4)cos(3)/2 + i(e
and
sin(4i+ 3)= (e-4i+3- e-4+ 3i)/(2i)
= (e-4(cos(3)+ i sin(3))/2i+ i(e4cos(3)+ i sin(3))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might also want to look up the definitions of the hyperbolic trig functions, cosh and sinh. Their definitions look a lot like the ones HallsofIvy gave for cos and sin, but without the factors of i. Thus, putting an i in the argument of a sin or cos gives you a cosh or sinh, and vice versa.
 
[tex]\sin (x+iy) = \sin x \cos iy + \cos x \sin iy[/tex]
[tex]=\sin x \cosh y + i\cos x\sinh y[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K