Trig identities, prove (cot(x)-tan(x)=2tan(2x))

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the trigonometric identity cot(x) - tan(x) = 2tan(2x). Participants conclude that this equation is not valid, as substituting x = π/4 results in the left-hand side being zero while the right-hand side is undefined. One contributor suggests that the equation may actually be intended as 2cot(2x) instead of 2tan(2x). The consensus is that the original equation likely contains an error, as proving it as an identity is not feasible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities
  • Familiarity with the cotangent and tangent functions
  • Ability to manipulate and simplify trigonometric expressions
  • Knowledge of specific angle values in trigonometry, such as π/4
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the list of trigonometric identities on Wikipedia
  • Learn how to prove trigonometric identities using algebraic manipulation
  • Explore the properties of cotangent and tangent functions
  • Investigate the conditions under which trigonometric identities hold true
USEFUL FOR

Students studying trigonometry, educators teaching trigonometric identities, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of trigonometric functions and their properties.

noahsdev
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove cot(x) - tan(x) = 2tan(2x)


Homework Equations


Trig identities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities

The Attempt at a Solution


I have worked it down and don't think they are equal. I think it's supposed to be 2cot(2x) not 2tan(2x), that is what I found. Am I correct or what have I done wrong?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0015.jpg
    IMG_0015.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 1,385
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I get the same result as you, although your calculation was a lot more complicated. If you let x=π/4, the LHS is zero while the RHS is undefined. So it cannot be 2tan(2x) for the equation to be an identity.
 
Thanks for the fast reply, my teacher wanted full working with identities so that's why it's in long form. I am not sure if it is a mistake or if it is a trick question, thanks.
 
noahsdev said:
Thanks for the fast reply, my teacher wanted full working with identities so that's why it's in long form. I am not sure if it is a mistake or if it is a trick question, thanks.
Most likely a mistake unless the question wanted you to find what particular subset of x satisfies the equation. But if it says 'Prove..' then that is not the case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K