Trigonometric Equation with Unequal Coefficients: How to Solve?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter John O' Meara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation 3\cos\frac{3x}{2}=\cos\frac{x}{2}. Participants explore various methods and approaches to tackle the equation, particularly focusing on the implications of having unequal coefficients in the cosine terms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about solving the equation due to the unequal coefficients and seeks guidance.
  • Another participant suggests transforming the equation using angle addition formulas, proposing a solution involving x = (2n + 1)\pi.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the interest in non-trivial solutions, introducing de Moivre's theorem and providing a method to express the equation in terms of powers of trigonometric functions.
  • One participant shares their own solution involving arccos and expresses confusion about the results, noting discrepancies with graphing calculator outputs.
  • Another participant points out that both arccos(2/3) and pi/4 are valid solutions, indicating potential overlap in solutions.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the steps used to derive the solutions, with participants discussing the implications of dividing by cos(y) and the conditions under which this is valid.
  • Participants reiterate the relationship between y and x, confirming the transformations and the resulting solutions derived from the earlier discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solutions, as there are multiple proposed approaches and interpretations of the results. Some solutions overlap, while others introduce different angles or methods, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made when transforming the equation and the conditions under which certain steps are valid, particularly when dividing by trigonometric functions.

John O' Meara
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Solve [tex]3\cos\frac{3x}{2}=\cos\frac{x}{2}[/tex] I am interested to know how to go about solving such an equation where the coefficient of cos(x) is not equal to 1. I know how to solve [tex]\cos\theta = \cos\alpha, \mbox{ it is just} \theta = 2n\pi +/-\alpha[/tex] I teach various maths subject to myself, then I realized I didn't know how to solve the above equation. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, [tex]\cos \frac{3x}{2} = \cos (x + \frac{x}{2})[/tex]

Therefore, you get [tex]x = (2n + 1)\pi \ for \ n = ...-3, -2, -1,0,1,2,3,...[/tex] as a freebie.
 
Surely the non-trivial solutions are more interesting.

You can always transform multiple angles to powers of trigonometric functions (and vice versa).
For example with de Moivre
[tex]\cos ny=\Re\left(\cos y+i\sin y\right)^n[/tex]
[tex]\cos 3y=\cos^3y-3\cos y\sin^2y=\cos^3y-3\cosy(1-\cos^2y)=\cos y(4\cos^2y-3)=\cos y(2\cos 2y-1)[/tex]

Since here on angle is three times the other, you can use y=x/2 and get
[tex]3\cos 3y=\cos y[/tex]
[tex]3\cos y(2\cos(2y)-1)=\cos y[/tex]
and therefore either
[tex]x=\pm\frac{\pi}{4}+k\pi[/tex]
or
[tex]x=\pm\frac14\arccos\frac23+k\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]
 
Thanks for the time you spent on working that out. I didn't know of De Moivre's. I worked it out afterwards and get [tex]2y=\pm \arccos(\frac{2}{3})+ 2n\pi[/tex]. And y=x/2, I couldn't [tex]x=\pm\frac{\pi}{4}+k\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex], which is what you got. According to my graphing calculator the graph crosses the x-axis at [tex]\arccos(\frac{2}{3})[/tex] which looks close to pi/4 but is not. It crosses the x-axis again close to pi.
 
Not sure what you mean.

Both 1/4arccos 2/3 and pi/4 are solutions.
 
I get a principle angle of arccos(2/3) = 2y and -arccos(2/3) is another one , right. Maybe I have already gone wrong. If I saw the steps you used I could follow you. [tex] 3\cosy(2\cos(2y)-1)=cosy, \mbox{therefore}\\<br /> 3(2\cos(2y)-1)=1, \\<br /> 2\cos(2y)-1=\frac{1}{3}, \\<br /> 2\cos(2y)=4/3, \\<br /> \cos(2y)=\frac{2}{3}[/tex]
 
The equation is
[tex]3\cos y(2\cos(2y)-1)=\cos y[/tex]
Now either cos(y) is zero (which gives you pi/4 for x) or you can divide by cos(y) and continue to get x=arccos(2/3)/4
 
Thanks.
 
Gerenuk said:
Since here on angle is three times the other, you can use y=x/2 and get
[tex]3\cos 3y=\cos y[/tex]
[tex]3\cos y(2\cos(2y)-1)=\cos y[/tex]
and therefore either
[tex]x=\pm\frac{\pi}{4}+k\pi[/tex]
or
[tex]x=\pm\frac14\arccos\frac23+k\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

If y = x/2 then x = 2y, so if the solutions for y are

[tex]y = \frac {\pi} {2} + k \pi[/tex]

or

[tex]y = \pm \frac {1} {2} \arccos \frac {2}{3} + k \pi[/tex]

then the solutions for x will be

[tex]x = (2k + 1) \pi[/tex]

or

[tex]x = \pm\arccos \frac {2}{3} + 2 k \pi[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Yes, that is what I finally finished up with, willem2.Thanks willem2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K