Trouble determining the slope of the graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter riseofphoenix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Slope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the slope of a graph and determining the value of the parameter B in a physics context. Users reported incorrect values for slope and B, with one participant calculating a slope of 0.0339 and suggesting a value for B of 0.85 N/m. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying the R² value for accuracy and clarifies that the "length" parameter in the data set may actually represent displacement. Additionally, issues with Excel crashing during graphing were noted, indicating a need for troubleshooting software problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear regression and slope calculation
  • Familiarity with Excel for data plotting and analysis
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as force, current, and displacement
  • Ability to interpret R² values in statistical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to troubleshoot Excel crashing issues during data analysis
  • Research the significance of R² values in regression analysis
  • Explore methods for accurately plotting displacement versus force graphs
  • Study the relationship between force, current, and magnetic field strength in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, data analysts using Excel, and anyone needing assistance with graphing and interpreting scientific data.

riseofphoenix
Messages
294
Reaction score
2
PHYSICSNUMBER1_zps52f97704.png


For the slope, I got 0.4532 and for B, I got 74.09, but they're both wrong! And my excel program keeps crashing everytime i try to print screen it!
This is really urgent and I don't know who else to turn to because this is due very very soon and I'm desperate!

Also, what about this one:

PHYSICSNUMBER2_zps14e71c66.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your R^2 value and see if it is close to 1. When I plot your values I don't get anything near 0.4 for the gradient. Does your answer require a specific set of units?
 
rock.freak667 said:
Check your R^2 value and see if it is close to 1. When I plot your values I don't get anything near 0.4 for the gradient. Does your answer require a specific set of units?

No :(
My computer keeps acting up whenever I try to print screen and save the excel file...
What numbers did you get?
 
You still there?
 
Around 0.008 N/cm or so.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Around 0.008 N/cm or so.

I submitted "0.008 N/cm" but webassign says it's incorrect :( :'(
That must mean my B is wrong too... :(
 
You might actually need to post your excel graph so we can see what is happening.
 
Try 0.85 N/m.

Also, I don't think that the parameter you call "length" is not the actual length of the wire, since, on the graph, when the force goes to zero, the "length" goes to zero. Therefore, I can only conclude that the parameter that your teacher called length in the table is actually displacement relative to the length under no load. If the parameter really is displacement, then you can add the point 0,0 to your graph for added accuracy.
 
Chestermiller said:
Try 0.85 N/m.

Also, I don't think that the parameter you call "length" is not the actual length of the wire, since, on the graph, when the force goes to zero, the "length" goes to zero. Therefore, I can only conclude that the parameter that your teacher called length in the table is actually displacement relative to the length under no load. If the parameter really is displacement, then you can add the point 0,0 to your graph for added accuracy.

Oh it worked! Thanks!

So all I need for B is do,

B = Faverage / IaverageLaverage
B = (0.02075)/(892.75 mA)(0.02525 m)
B = 0.02075/22.54
B = 0.000920586
B = 920 T
 
  • #10
Fot Question 2,

I got the slope correct. It's 0.0339.

But how do I find B, given L = 4.1 cm?

This is what I did (I chose any value for F and I from the table):
B = F/IL
B = (0.0158 N) / (0.48 A)(0.041)
B = 0.0158/0.01968
B = 0.802 N/a

"INCORRECT"

:(
 
  • #11
You still there? :(
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
Try 0.85 N/m.

Also, I don't think that the parameter you call "length" is not the actual length of the wire, since, on the graph, when the force goes to zero, the "length" goes to zero. Therefore, I can only conclude that the parameter that your teacher called length in the table is actually displacement relative to the length under no load. If the parameter really is displacement, then you can add the point 0,0 to your graph for added accuracy.

You still there? :(
 
  • #13
Oh no :( :( :(
 
  • #14
Can someone please help me?
 
  • #15
Anybody still here?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
31K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K