MHB Troubleshooting Euclid's Lemma Proof in Modular Arithmetic
- Thread starter Joe20
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Arithmetic Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving Euclid's lemma in modular arithmetic, highlighting challenges faced in the proof. A counterexample is provided, illustrating that \(2 \mod 4 \times 2 \mod 4 = 0 \mod 4\). The proof emphasizes that since \(p\) is prime, any multiple of \(p\) must include \(p\) as a factor, resulting in \(0 \mod p\). It concludes that the only way to achieve \(0 \mod p\) through multiplication in \(\mathbf{Z}_p\) is by multiplying with \(0 \mod p\). This reinforces the validity of Euclid's lemma in the context of modular arithmetic.
Similar threads
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 4 ·