Troubleshooting: Imaging Agarose Gel with Ethidium Bromide

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on troubleshooting issues with imaging agarose gels stained with Ethidium Bromide (EtBr) in a 96-well format. Users report faint bands near the edges of large gels (300 ml, 1.5% agarose) when using a UV box for photography. The consensus indicates that inadequate UV illumination is likely the primary issue rather than EtBr degradation, as bands become visible when the gel is repositioned. Suggestions include considering smaller gel sizes or improving UV box lighting to enhance band visibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of agarose gel electrophoresis techniques
  • Familiarity with Ethidium Bromide (EtBr) staining protocols
  • Knowledge of UV imaging equipment and its limitations
  • Experience with PCR-RFLP methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods to enhance UV illumination for larger agarose gels
  • Learn about optimizing Ethidium Bromide concentrations for gel imaging
  • Explore techniques to minimize evaporation during PCR and restriction digestion
  • Investigate alternative gel sizes and configurations for high-throughput sample analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for molecular biologists, geneticists, and laboratory technicians involved in high-throughput DNA analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis. It provides insights into troubleshooting imaging issues and optimizing gel performance.

MatthewHaas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am running agarose gels (1.5%, 100 V, 100 min) with the product of PCR-RFLP.

My gel has 96 wells...48 on top and 48 on the bottom, so it is a rather large gel...300 ml by volume.

I am having trouble getting clear, bright bands for the DNA in the lanes near the edges. It is very faint. When I shift the gel in the UV box, so the edge is closer to the center, I can see the bands very clearly.

Do I need more EtBr to see this when the gel is in the position I want to photograph? I added 15 ul initially, but reuse the gels (per instruction) and out of fear for overloading the gel, I don't add EtBr each time even though I think it is being degraded when I microwave the gel to get it into a liquid again. When I do, it is on the order of 2-3 ul.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It sounds like the lighting from your UV box isn't adequate for the size of the gels you are running.

I don't think it would be a problem with the EtBr staining itself, if when you shift the edges to center they are clearly visible. Is it possible to run smaller gels and then do your photography and give them a side by side? Or better yet, why are you using the gel size that you are?
 
I need to run 96 samples at a time, otherwise I would consider smaller.
 
I agree with bobze- it sounds like an optics problem, not a problem with the protocol. Not sure how you could easily modify the light box to increase the illumination area (alternatively, putting a central stop on the detector side and increasing the exposure time).
 
I run 96 samples on 100 ml gels. Do you really need the large gels or would you consider running smaller gels?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the responses everyone.

I run 96 samples at a time because this is a population genetics project and the number of reactions that I am performing numbers in the thousands.

I've done quite a few more gels now, and some have bands clear as day on the edges. I am beginning to think that, where the bands are faint, evaporation occurred in the plates during PCR and/or restriction digestion (even though I use a plastic sticky sheet to prevent this from happening).

Sometimes, it is specific wells that I have trouble with-"repeat offenders", so to speak. For those of you who do 96 samples at a time, how do you make certain nothing evaporates? I am pressing all the edges down, making sure there are no air bubbles trapped inside.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K