Troubleshooting NonlinearModelFit in Mathematica

  • Thread starter Thread starter cep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 5K views
cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm working on this Mathematica assignment, just basic tutorial-type stuff (you can ignore the details about pyrene, not important), and the fit on this function won't converge. Someone in my class said it converged fine, so I was wondering if anyone notices any errors in my work. Alternatively, can you think of any alternative ways to express the function?

Thanks!

Homework Statement




3. Formation and Decay of Pyrene Excimer in Solution

The traces for pyrene fluorescence (see Experiment 3) show a fast rise and a slower fall processes which correspond to a complex kinetic of the formation and decay of the pyrene excimer in solution. The evolution of the excimer fluorescence intensity I(t) in time t can be described by the following equation:

I(t) = -Ae-kat+Be-kbt

Data are provided in a file “emission_data” with time given in the first column, while the fluorescence intensity given in the second column.

REPORT:
(1) Find coefficients A, B, ka and kb. Estimate standard error and confidence levels for these parameters. Hint: see Mathematica help menu for function NonlinearModelFit.
(2) Provide plot of data with the superimposed fit function


Homework Equations



Mathematica knowledge

The Attempt at a Solution



See attached screenshot.

I can get 3/4 coefficients, but I don't know if they're correct due to the fourth one failing to converge, and I can't make the plot without all coefficients!
 

Attachments

  • screen-capture-12.png
    screen-capture-12.png
    7.9 KB · Views: 678
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-linear function fits can be very sensitive to the starting values of the function parameters. I'd think there would be an option to provide starting 'guesses'. If so, playing around with the starting values could fix the problem.