Troubleshooting of WFE - (Wiped Film Evaporator)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on troubleshooting a Wiped Film Evaporator (WFE) for the separation of components X and Y, where component X constitutes 80% of the feed and has a boiling point of 105°C, while component Y makes up 20% with a boiling point of 256°C. The current operation at 50 Torr and 90°C yields an undesirable top distillate containing approximately 10% component Y and 80% in the bottom residue. The discussion emphasizes the importance of modeling the operation using Aspen Plus, which can help identify discrepancies between model predictions and actual observations, particularly regarding vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) and the selection of appropriate property packages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wiped Film Evaporator (WFE) operations
  • Familiarity with Aspen Plus simulation software
  • Knowledge of vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) principles
  • Experience with process data analysis in distillation
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate Aspen Plus property package selection, particularly the Peng-Robinson (PR) model for non-polar components
  • Analyze the vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data for components X and Y to improve model accuracy
  • Conduct a sensitivity analysis on feed rate and operating conditions to optimize component separation
  • Review tutorials on Aspen Plus for advanced modeling techniques in distillation processes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for process engineers, chemical engineers, and anyone involved in the optimization of separation processes, particularly those working with wiped film evaporators and Aspen Plus simulations.

Rachit
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Continuous boiloff operation in WFE.
Feed Details :
Component X : 80% ( Boiling point : 105 deg.C)
Component Y : 20% ( Boiling point : 256 deg.C)
Feed Rate : 600 kg/hr
Heating medium : Steam @ 145 deg.C
operating condition : 50 Torr, 90 deg.C ( Based on Aspen Flash Simulation).

Desired Outcome :
TO remove 99% of component X from Component Y.

History :
Earlier this operation was performed in batch mode. Where all of component X was boiled off.
During this, Bottom mass temperature was observed to go upto 120 deg.C uder 50 torr of vacuum.
No component Y was observed in the top distillate - throughout the operation.

Current Scenario :
Observations in WFE :
  1. In top distillate component Y is found ~10%.
  2. In bottom residue component Y is found ~80%.
  3. At 50 torr vacuum, operating temperature is only 40 deg.C.
  4. Upon increasing flowrate, component Y is found less in top distillate.

What should be done to minimize loss of component Y in top distillate ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you tried to model this operation? Is the solution ideal so that Raoult's Law can be applied.
 
Chestermiller said:
Have you tried to model this operation? Is the solution ideal so that Raoult's Law can be applied.
The solution is not ideal, but I have modeled the operation in Aspen plus and component Y in top distillate is ~0.5% w/w.
 
The first step is to determine why your model is not matching the observed split. What are your thoughts on this? How do other observational measurements compare with model predictions? How confident are you in the VLE part of the model?
 
My friend

Aspen Plus has a set of properties packages that will approach the simulation to the real process. It has a tutorial to select the best ones. However, you have to select PR if your components do not have a polar behavior.

To optimize the process, it could be done with the process data. Of course, anyone needs to know X and Y, to have a view of the distillation equilibrium of the mix. Simulation is a tool, just that; but trained process engineers should do it by analyzing the field process data.

Horacio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K