Troubleshooting Trigonometry: Finding Coefficient of Friction on a Slope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This problem deals with finding the coefficient of friction between an object and a slope, specifically involving an object with mass m sliding down a hill with a slope of θ at a constant velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between gravitational force and kinetic friction, questioning the reasoning behind the use of sin(θ) in the equations presented. There is also a focus on the implications of constant velocity on the forces involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the reasoning behind the forces acting on the object, particularly regarding the balance of forces at constant velocity. However, there is still exploration of the original poster's thought process and the assumptions made in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a drawing included for reference, which may provide additional context to the problem setup. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the original poster's reasoning to identify errors in their approach.

Glype11
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
This problem deals with finding the coefficient of friction between an object and a slope. It gives an object with mass m, sliding down a hill with a slope of θ at a constant velocity. I got mgsinθ=fksinθ.
However the book shows mgsinθ=fk. The kinetic friction force and the force down the slope are parallel but directed in opposite directions, so where is my error? I included a drawing for reference.
 

Attachments

  • slide.jpg
    slide.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming "fk" is "F_k" which is the force of kinetic friction?

The direction of kinetic friction is naturally in the opposite direction as the motion, so what was your reasoning for multiplying it by sin(θ)?

Glype11 said:
I got mgsinθ=fksinθ.

That can just be simplified to mg=F_k

Does mg=F_k make sense to you? That would imply that the angle θ is irrelevant. Does that seem right?
 
Glype11 said:
so where is my error?

No one can really tell you your error unless you take us through the train of thought that led you to your answer (which you didn't explain).How does the fact that it's moving at a constant velocity effect this problem?
 
Nathanael said:
No one can really tell you your error unless you take us through the train of thought that led you to your answer (which you didn't explain).


How does the fact that it's moving at a constant velocity effect this problem?

Because it is constant velocity the down slope component of gravity must balance the frictional force. I figured out my error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K