True or false; differentiability

  • Thread starter Thread starter stukbv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiability
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
17 replies · 2K views
stukbv
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if g:[-1,1] -> Reals is differentiable with g(0) = 0 and g(x) doesn't equal 0 for x not = 0 and f : Reals -> Reals is a continuous function with f(x)/g(x) ->1 as x->0 then f(x) is differentiable at 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I took f(x) = |x| and g(x) = arcsin(x) , does this work as a counter example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its the limit as x --> 0 that i want though?
 
Ok, why doesn't the limit exist? Can i not apply l'hospital's?
 
hmm that's odd, in my lecture notes i have a definition which says suppose f and g are differentiable at all x in (a,b) \ {c} and g'(x) doesn't = 0 for all x in (a,b)\{c} then
if l = limf'(c)/g'(c) as x--> c exists and = l then it is the limit as x--> x of f(x)/g(x)??

Now I am really confused?
 
stukbv said:
hmm that's odd, in my lecture notes i have a definition which says suppose f and g are differentiable at all x in (a,b) \ {c} and g'(x) doesn't = 0 for all x in (a,b)\{c} then
if l = limf'(c)/g'(c) as x--> c exists and = l then it is the limit as x--> x of f(x)/g(x)??

Now I am really confused?

Yes, I'm sorry, your lecture notes are correct. But the limit still doesn't exist, like you can see in my link...
 
is it 0? since that's the only way we would get f(x) / g(x) -> 1 as x-> 0 ?
 
ermmm so do i say since f is continuous lim f(h) as h->0 = f(0) = 0
So the whole thing tends to one? argh not sure !?
 
No idea what you mean.. how can i use g to show something about f