Why Do Some Odd Numbers Fail to Be Prime?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vroman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the ambiguity of true/false questions in physics and logic, particularly regarding the nature of motion and acceleration. Participants debate the validity of statements related to speed, velocity, and acceleration, concluding that many questions lack necessary qualifiers, leading to confusion. The statement "Odd numbers are prime numbers" is highlighted as particularly ambiguous, as it can be interpreted in multiple ways. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity and precision in educational assessments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as motion, speed, and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with logical reasoning and the principles of true/false statements.
  • Knowledge of mathematical definitions of prime numbers.
  • Experience with educational assessment design and question formulation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of motion and acceleration in classical mechanics.
  • Study the definitions and properties of prime numbers in number theory.
  • Explore best practices for writing clear and unambiguous test questions.
  • Learn about logical reasoning and the interpretation of truth values in formal logic.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and test designers seeking to improve their understanding of physics concepts and enhance the clarity of assessment questions.

vroman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
For some reason, my answers to these questions are wrong, but I don't understand which ones and why, please help:

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time...False
B)THe velocity of an accelerated body changes with time...True
C)The words motion and acceleration can be used interchangeably...False
D)The position of a body in motion changes with time...False
E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...False
F)Motion and acceleration are not the same quantity...True
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vroman,

They're all right except one. That should help! :wink:
 
Thanks, I figured it out!
 
vroman said:
For some reason, my answers to these questions are wrong, but I don't understand which ones and why, please help:

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time...False
B)THe velocity of an accelerated body changes with time...True
C)The words motion and acceleration can be used interchangeably...False
D)The position of a body in motion changes with time...False
E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...False
F)Motion and acceleration are not the same quantity...True

I'm sorry to be a stickler here, but which teacher would set such dumb, ambiguous questions for students ?


My answers would be different for A and E :

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time... Not necessarily, but unable to determine if true or false from just this.

E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...Again, not necessarily, but unable to determine if true or false from just this

If the questions had included the critical word necessarily then they would be OK, but as they stand, I consider them inadequate and misleading.
 
Curious3141 said:
If the questions had included the critical word necessarily then they would be OK, but as they stand, I consider them inadequate and misleading.

When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".
 
jdavel said:
When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".

yah, "is" always denotes "true = always true"
 
jdavel said:
When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".

Hmmph, where did such an idiotic convention come from, and are the students taught to assume this by default ? No wonder most of them do so poorly at formal logic, they're not even taught the correct meanings of false and true ! :smile:

It's all well and good to have this sort of convention for binary dichotomous choices. But I've seen more "complex" truth type questions, where there are choices for T, F, Insufficient info. If faced with a three pronged choice like that, I'd go for the third one, but it can be confusing if students have been taught all along that T = always, necessarily true and F = not always true, but not necessarily false either.
 
Curious,

Is the statement "Odd numbers are prime numbers" true, false, or is there "insufficient info" to say one way or the other?

I see no difference (logically) between that statement and the statement "The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero."
 
jdavel said:
Curious,

Is the statement "Odd numbers are prime numbers" true, false, or is there "insufficient info" to say one way or the other?

I would consider the above statement to be ambiguous. I understand that the intended implication is that a general odd number is necessarily a prime (which of course is FALSE), but it is still possible for confusion with the alternative implication that certain specific odds can be prime (which is TRUE). I would be comfortable with this sort of statement in a conversation, where clarification can always be sought, but not in a textbook, and certainly not in a graded test.

Maybe it's just me, but I expect strict logical clarity in my test questions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K