Truss analysis, determining internal forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the analysis of internal forces in a truss structure, specifically addressing the method of joints and the implications of support conditions. The participant, Peter, correctly identifies the internal force states for various members, including compression in segments AB, CB, and BD, and tension in segments AD, AC, and CD. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions of support conditions, highlighting that if both supports are hinged, the structure becomes externally redundant and cannot be solved using equilibrium equations alone.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations: ∑F_x = 0, ∑F_y = 0, ∑M = 0
  • Familiarity with the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Knowledge of support conditions (hinged vs. roller supports)
  • Concept of internal redundancy in truss structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of different support conditions on truss analysis
  • Learn about the method of sections for truss analysis
  • Explore the effects of joint rigidity on internal force calculations
  • Investigate external redundancy in truss structures and its impact on solvability
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in truss design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of internal force calculations and support conditions in truss structures.

pedrok
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



truss.png


I've been given the above truss and have to analyze it's internal forces as part of the problem, the other part of the problem is to analyze for which lengths members will fail, in what order and for which force F, however this is not the part that I find difficult.

In the actual problem statement it says the following: * Do not analyze segment AB it is assumed strong enough do to the support and AB can only extend or contract along its length.

Homework Equations


\sum F_x = 0
\sum F_y = 0
\sum M = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to work the method of joints, but first off from the statement (marked with * above) I gather that I should introduce a support at either point A or B which gives reaction forces and then also makes it a statically determinate truss structure, then I think the following happens (please correct me if I'm wrong):

part CB : in compression
part AB : in compression
part AD : in tension
part CD : in tension
part BD : in compression
part AC : in tension

Then analysis per joint gives me the follow equations:
A - \sum F_x = F_{ad} + F_{ac} \cdot cos(45) = 0

- \sum F_y = -F_{ab} + F_{ac} \cdot sin(45) = 0

B - \sum F_x = Rb_x - F_{bc} - F_{bd} \cdot cos(45) = 0

- \sum F_y = Rb_y - F_{ab} + F_{bd} \cdot sin(45) = 0

C - \sum F_x = F_{bc} - F_{ac} \cdot cos(45) = 0

- \sum F_y = -F - F_{cd} - F_{ac} \cdot sin(45) = 0

D - \sum F_x = -F_{ad} + F_{bd} \cdot cos(45) = 0

- \sum F_y = F_{cd} - F{bd} \cdot sin(45) = 0

I now have 8 equations with 8 variables (although F is also given as a variable, I can end up with equation based on F for this purpose) and this should be solvable, but I have no idea how to start, at which point and if the assumption for a support is valid and or logical (or simplifying).

Any help is greatly appreciated!
Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you need to define the support conditions more precisely as either hinged or as rollers. If they are both hinged, then the structure is externally redundant and cannot be solved with equilibrium equations alone. Secondly, the nature of the joints is not clear. If they are assumed pinned joints, then the structure is once redundant internally and cannot be solved with equilibrium equations alone. If the joints have any rigidity then you have bending moments and shear forces in addition to axial compressions and tensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K