Truss Analysis: Find Reaction Forces with Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paladashe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments Trusses
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on truss analysis, specifically the calculation of reaction forces at supports using equilibrium equations. Participants clarify that to find the reaction forces, one must apply both linear force components and moment equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of not assuming equal vertical forces at pins and highlights the use of the moment equation to solve for unknowns. Key calculations involve a 100N applied force and its decomposition into vertical and horizontal components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Knowledge of truss structures and support types (roller, pin)
  • Familiarity with force decomposition and vector analysis
  • Ability to apply moment equations in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Learn about calculating moments in static systems
  • Explore the concept of force equilibrium in rigid bodies
  • Review examples of truss analysis problems and solutions
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, and anyone involved in mechanical design or analysis of truss systems will benefit from this discussion.

Paladashe
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new on this website and it seems great :p So, I'm struggling with something really simple... trusses analysis. I'm struggling with moments etc , I've just drawn an example linked in this post , could you try to find the reaction forces (roller pin etc) with some explanation ? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 471
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Paladashe! Welcome to PF! :wink:

(please use the homework forum in future)

If I'm understanding the question correctly, no truss analysis is involved …

you have a rigid body with one applied force (plus its own weight), and you have to find the two reaction forces, so just use linear components of force, and moments …

show us what you get. :smile:
 
Thanks Tiny-tim for your response. In fact, I now for vertical external forces and horizontal ones so I divided the 100N vector in two vectors (one with a value of 50N orientated downwards and one with a value of 50•(square root of 3). I found that each pin has a vertical vector orientated upwards with a value of 25 N and for the fixed one, also an horizontal vector with a value of 50•(square roots of 3 orientated to the left). Am I right? I'm sure that I've made some mistake...what value did you find?
 
Hi Paladashe! :smile:
Paladashe said:
Thanks Tiny-tim for your response. In fact, I now for vertical external forces and horizontal ones so I divided the 100N vector in two vectors (one with a value of 50N orientated downwards and one with a value of 50•(square root of 3).

Correct. :smile:
I found that each pin has a vertical vector orientated upwards with a value of 25 N…

Nooo …

you can't assume they're equal, can you?

all you know is that they add to 50N, so you need one more equation, which is … ? :wink:
 
The moment equation, right?
... EMa=-50•3•12,1244 + 50(square root of 3)•7 + 4•12,1244•Rb ?
 
Where a is the pin fixed and b the roller pin
 
Paladashe said:
The moment equation, right?

Yes. :smile:

(either about A or about B)
... EMa=-50•3•12,1244 + 50(square root of 3)•7 + 4•12,1244•Rb ?

(where 12.1244 = 14*√3/2)

Yes …

or you could avoid splitting the 100 N by doing 100 times the lever arm (the perpendicular distance from the line of the 100 N to the point A). :wink:
 
Yes but don't know how to do this because its not perpendicular to the line of action:)
 
Yes, but by doing my equation , I found that Rb=50N so R(vertical) is equal to 0??
 
  • #10
use trig :wink:
 
  • #11
yes but it's not working for me :p could you please try to explain why my equation is wrong ? Please ! I'm getting a headache by trying and trying :p
 
  • #12
Paladashe said:
Yes, but by doing my equation , I found that Rb=50N …

I don't get 50 :confused:
 
  • #13
-50?
 
  • #14
i mean, using your equation (which is a little confusing :redface:) i don't get 50
 
  • #15
Can you give me your result ? Is it 37,5?
 
  • #16
from your equation (am i misreading it?) i got 25 :confused:
 
  • #17
No as you said before, we can't assume that both pin have the same vertical forces (25-25). Or, if Rby is equal to 25 and that EFy=0 <=> -50+25+Ray=0 :) so Ray is equal to 0 which is impossible
 
  • #18
(just got up :zzz:)
Paladashe said:
No as you said before, we can't assume that both pin have the same vertical forces (25-25).

yes, we can't assume it …

but that doesn't mean that we can't prove it (if it's true) :wink:
Or, if Rby is equal to 25 and that EFy=0 <=> -50+25+Ray=0 :) so Ray is equal to 0 which is impossible
not following you …

doesn't -50+25+Ray=0 mean Ray = 25 ? :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
866
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K