Trust Fund problem using series and sequences

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aristarchus_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences Series
Aristarchus_
Messages
95
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
A person sets up a fund of 3,000,000 dollars which is to pay out a certain amount every year in the future, the first time in three years. The fund has a yield of 4.5% per year. How big can the annual payments be?
Relevant Equations
Convergance of a geometric series: ##S_n = \frac {a_1}{1-k}##, where k is the quotient , a_1 is the first term.
Sum of a geometric series: ## S_n = a_1 \cdot \frac{k^{n}-1}{k-1}##
The correct answer given in the textbook is 147,423 dollars
I have tried inserting 0.955 in the above formula for the sum of a geometric series and setting it equal to 3,000,000 (S_n) with n =3. This did not work out well
My second attempt was, considering that the payment is paid every year in the future, to use the convergence formula. There k = 0.955 and S_n = 3,000,000, this gives me the wrong answer of 135,000 dollars annual payment...
What does "first time in three years" imply? And how is it connected to the geometric series formula?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the value of the fund at the start of year n is P_n, then what is its value P_{n+1} at the start of the next year, given that we have withdrawn a paymanet of A during the year and received interest at a rate r = 4.5\,\% on the balance?

The question doesn't give a set term for the annuity, so I guess it is looking for the maximum payment we can take without diminishing the value of the fund, which is the value of A which makes P_{n+1} = P_n. Since we don't start withdrawing payments until after year 3, this tells us the value of P_n to use to determine A.
 
pasmith said:
If the value of the fund at the start of year n is P_n, then what is its value P_{n+1} at the start of the next year, given that we have withdrawn a paymanet of A during the year and received interest at a rate r = 4.5\,\% on the balance?

The question doesn't give a set term for the annuity, so I guess it is looking for the maximum payment we can take without diminishing the value of the fund, which is the value of A which makes P_{n+1} = P_n. Since we don't start withdrawing payments until after year 3, this tells us the value of P_n to use to determine A.
What does "first time in three years" imply? I saw a couple of problems of this sort and it confuses me
 
Aristarchus_ said:
What does "first time in three years" imply?
Not sure what you mean by what it implies, but what it means is that the initial amount, $3,000,000, sits in the account for three years, accruing interest. No payments are withdrawn during this period.
 
Mark44 said:
Not sure what you mean by what it implies, but what it means is that the initial amount, $3,000,000, sits in the account for three years, accruing interest. No payments are withdrawn during this period.
Right...so it would grow by an annual interest amount?
 
Mark44 said:
Not sure what you mean by what it implies, but what it means is that the initial amount, $3,000,000, sits in the account for three years, accruing interest. No payments are withdrawn during this period.
I got the correct answer by setting in the geometric sum formula 3,000,000 * 1.045^2. This means, as you said, that in those three years, the amount has grown by this much (the first year just 3,000,000 fixed, second 3,000,000*1.045, third 3,000,000*1.045...). Thank you
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top