1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Trying to Calculate k, using Hooke's Law

  1. Nov 25, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    The position of a 49 g oscillating mass is given by x(t)=(1.8cm)cos12t, where t is in seconds.

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I've tried working this problem multiple different ways and it is just not working for me.
    I used k= (.049*9.8)/.018
    Is this correct with the information I've been given? I used up all my attempts and the solution is apparently
    7.1 N/m...but I keep coming up with roughly 26.7 N/m
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 25, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2017 Award

    Hello ex master, :welcome:
    It is not. One can stretch a spring wrt its equilibrium state, and then let go. The amount of stretch becomes the amplitude of the ensuing oscillation so it has little to do with the spring constant.
    You have been given another bit of info that does have a relationship with the spring constant. Can you guess which bit ?
  4. Nov 25, 2016 #3
    kx = mg answers the question "how much does the spring stretch when I add this mass". It is an equilibrium answer. The problem didn't tell you how long the spring was before you added mass, or for that matter how long the spring was after the mass was added. What you have is how the spring oscillates about the equilibrium point. Do you have any other equations or ideas that might apply?
  5. Nov 25, 2016 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yes, but even then that is only in a vertical context.
    @masterexploder , there is nothing in the question about the spring being vertical. This could be happening on a smooth horizontal surface, so you have no basis for involving g.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted