Trying to find the measure of a set.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamesandthegi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Set
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the Lebesgue measure of two specific sets defined by their decimal expansions. Set A consists of numbers in the interval [0,1) where the nth digit is 7, and it has been established that its measure is 0. Set B includes numbers where all but finitely many digits are 7, and while its measure is also 0, the challenge lies in proving its measurability. The key argument presented is that B can be expressed as a union of countable Borel sets, thus confirming its Lebesgue measurability. Overall, the conclusion is that both sets are Lebesgue measurable with a measure of 0.
Jamesandthegi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am trying to learn about Lebesgue measure. One of the questions I couldn't solve is this;

Show that the following sets are Lebesgue measurable and determine their measure

A = {x in [0,1) : the nth digit in the decimal expansion is equal to 7}

B = {x in [0,1) : all but finitely many digits in the decimal expansion are equal to 7}

Now, the book defines a set E to be Lebesgue measurable if E = A U B, where A is in the Borel $\sigma$-algebra and B is a null set (outer measure 0), but I don't see where that helps here. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I figured out A, but I'm not sure on B. Any help?
 
The measure is 0. The general idea is that for any n if n digits are 7, then the measure is (1/10)n. So let n -> ∞
 
Yes, but that doesn't prove that it's measurable. To prove its so, you have to write it as A U B, A borel and B null. Then the measure part I get.
 
If its null it is measurable. You can always union it with the empty set of you insist on having a Borel set to union with.
 
For a fixed finite set of decimal place not equal to seven the number of points is finite. So for instance the number of points if only the first 2 place are not 7 is 100. The number of finite subsets of a countable set is countable, I think. So the union of all of these finite sets is countable and thus Borel measurable zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K