Trying to prove F^infinity is infinite dimensional

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhillipKP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the vector space \mathbb{F}^{\infty} is infinite dimensional. The initial argument suggests that since \mathbb{F}^{\infty} cannot contain a list of infinite length, it must be infinite dimensional. However, this reasoning is challenged, as finite dimensional vector spaces do not require a list of vectors to span the space; they only need to be spanned by a finite number of elements. A counterexample is provided, illustrating that certain sequences can form a finite dimensional space without being listed. The conversation highlights the need for clearer reasoning in the proof to establish the infinite dimensionality of \mathbb{F}^{\infty}.
PhillipKP
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Theorem: Prove that \mathbb{F}^{\infty} infinite dimensional

Homework Equations



Definition of Infinite Dimensional Vector Space: A vector space that
is not finite dimension

Definition of Finite Dimensional Vector Space: \exists list of vectors
in it that spans the space

Definition of List of Length n: An ordered collection of n objects.
It has finite length.

The Attempt at a Solution

1) \mathbb{F}^{n} is the set of all list of length n

2) \mathbb{F}^{\infty} is the set of all list of length \infty

2.1) This contradicts the definition of list \therefore there is
no list of infinite length \therefore it cannot be a finite dimensional
vector space because it doesn't contain a list \therefore it is
an infinite dimensional vector space.

My solution seems weak in that it doesn't use any math. But does
it actually prove the theorem? If not can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a good outline for a proof. Suppose that F^{\infty} isn't of infinite dimension. Then it must be of dimension n. So the set (consisting of n vectors) \beta = (1, 0, 0, ... 0), (0, 1, 0, ... 0), ... , (0, 0, ... , 1) must span F^{\infty}.

Obviously (1, 2, 3, ... , n+1) \in F^{\infty}. Is that vector in \beta ?
 
It's not in the list \beta, it's in the span of \beta. Right?
 
Sorry, my question should have been, "is that vector in the span of \beta?"
 
I don't understand where you are trying to go with this. There is no contradiction if you suppose that it is not infinite dimensional.
 
Never mind this was due last week and my proof was correct according to the solutions.
 
PhillipKP said:
I don't understand where you are trying to go with this. There is no contradiction if you suppose that it is not infinite dimensional.
Since you are trying to prove it is infinite dimensional there had better be!
 
PhillipKP said:
... \therefore it cannot be a finite dimensional
vector space because it doesn't contain a list \therefore...

This reasoning is not clear. A finite dimensional vector space does not need to contain a list; it need only satisfy the axioms defining a vector space and be spanned by a finite amount of elements of that space under scalar multiplication and vector addition. Ie., the set of sequences of the form (n, 0, 0, ...) for all real n forms a 1-dimensional vector space under pointwise addition, but it does not consist of any lists.
J89's outline has a similar missing link: ie., it refers to a list of vectors that are not themselves elements of Foo as potential spanning vectors for Foo, which is unfounded.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
825