MHB Trying to reverse structure a calculation to arrive at original variable

lsargent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Trying to reverse-calculate an equation to achieve one of the original variables when not present.

1) You have a number... A (which is always a positive number)

2) A is multiplied by 1.75%

3) This result is then added to A, and the resulting sum being B, i.e. (A x 0.0175) + A = B

In my scenario, the 0.0175 multiplier is known and is constant. Also, value B is known. I'm struggling to reverse structure this equation to arrive at A.

Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you have after combining like terms is:

$$1.0175A=B$$

And so dividing both sides by 1.0175, you obtain:

$$A=\frac{B}{1.0175}=\frac{400}{407}B$$
 
Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top