Trying to understand electric and magnetic fields as 4-vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the transformation of electric and magnetic fields as 4-vectors, utilizing the electromagnetic field tensor, denoted as ##F^{\alpha\beta}##. The participant derived the temporal and spatial components of the electric field ##E^{\alpha}## and magnetic field ##B^{\alpha}## using specific equations, including the Lorentz transformation equations. The challenge presented involves demonstrating the correct transformation of these fields under a general boost, particularly addressing the presence of ##\gamma^2## terms in the transformation equations. The participant seeks clarification on how to estimate these terms accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-vectors and their application in physics
  • Familiarity with the electromagnetic field tensor, ##F^{\alpha\beta}##
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformation equations
  • Basic concepts of special relativity, including the Lorentz factor ##\gamma(u)##
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electromagnetic field tensor and its components
  • Learn about the implications of Lorentz transformations on electric and magnetic fields
  • Investigate the role of the Lorentz factor ##\gamma(u)## in field transformations
  • Explore advanced topics in special relativity, focusing on field transformations under various boosts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of electromagnetism, and anyone studying special relativity who seeks to deepen their understanding of the transformation of electric and magnetic fields as 4-vectors.

user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Assuming that the first pair of equations given below are correct, how do I show that the electric and magnetic fields obtained transform correctly under general Lorentz boost?
Relevant Equations
The relevant equations are provided below.
I was trying to show that the field transformation equations do hold when considering electric and magnetic fields as 4-vectors. To start off, I obtained the temporal and spatial components of ##E^{\alpha}## and ##B^{\alpha}##. The expressions are obtained from the following equations:

$$E^{\alpha}=F^{\alpha\beta}U_{\beta},\: B^{\alpha}=\frac{1}{2c}\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}F_{\beta\mu}U_{\nu}$$

I obtained:
\begin{align*}
E^{0}&=F^{00}U_{0}+F^{0i}U_{i}=\frac{\gamma(u)}{c}\left(\vec{E}\cdot\vec{u}\right)\\
E^{i}&=F^{i0}U_{0}+F^{ij}U_{j}=\gamma(u)\left[\vec{E}+\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{B}\right)\right]^{i}\\
B^{0}&=\frac{1}{2c}\epsilon^{0\beta\mu\nu}F_{\beta\mu}U_{\nu}=-\frac{\gamma(u)}{c}\left(\vec{B}\cdot\vec{u}\right)\\
B^{i}&=\frac{1}{2c}\epsilon^{i\beta\mu 0}F_{\beta\mu}U_{0}+\frac{1}{2c}\epsilon^{i\beta\mu j}F^{\beta\mu}U_{j}=\gamma(u)\left[\vec{B}-\frac{\vec{u}}{c^2}\times\vec{E}\right]^{i}
\end{align*}

I interpreted the above components as that of fields observed by a stationary observer. To show that the fields transform correctly I have to show that:
$$\vec E' = \gamma \left( \vec E + c\vec \beta \times \vec B\right) - \frac{\gamma^2}{\gamma +1} \vec \beta \left( \vec\beta \cdot \vec E \right )$$
$$\vec B' = \gamma \left( \vec B - \frac{\vec \beta}{c} \times \vec E\right) - \frac{\gamma^2}{\gamma +1} \vec \beta \left( \vec\beta \cdot \vec B \right )$$

i.e. I have to show that I am able to construct the RHS from the components I have found. However, I do not seem to be able to show that using the Lorentz transformation equations under general boost. The Lorentz transformation equations under general boost is given as:
$$A^{'0}=\gamma\left(A^0-\vec{\beta}\cdot\vec{A}\right)$$
$$\vec{A}'_{\parallel}=\gamma\left(\vec{A}_{\parallel}-\vec{\beta}A^0\right)$$
$$\vec{A}'_{\perp}=\vec{A}_{\perp}$$

How should I proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula without ##\gamma^2## terms seem correct Lorentz transformation. How do you estimate these terms necessary ?
 
What do you mean?
 
\vE¯∥=\vE∥,\vE¯⊥=γ(\vE⊥+\vv×\vB⊥)I am sorry to say my post #1 was wrong.

Electric fields and magnetic fields from electromagnetic tensor comes from
E_{i}=cF_{0i},\ B_i=-\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}F^{jk}

I wonder whether it is same as your formula in post #1 and what are ##E^0## and ##B^0##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K