Trying to understand Special Relativity

simpleton
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was reading on special relativity and was trying to understand it. However, I am still not very sure about the concepts. For example, I have this problem:

I have 2 spaceships, A and B, traveling towards each other. Both have rest length x and speed v, where v is near the speed of light. Both are getting bombarded by photons that travel perpendicular to the direction of the spaceships.

The person in A will think "Hmm, due to length contraction, the rate at which he gets hit by photons is smaller than mine"

Person B will think the same way.

Person C in the observer frame will think that both ships will get hit at the same rate.

How do you resolve this contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
simpleton said:
Hi,

I was reading on special relativity and was trying to understand it. However, I am still not very sure about the concepts. For example, I have this problem:

I have 2 spaceships, A and B, traveling towards each other. Both have rest length x and speed v, where v is near the speed of light. Both are getting bombarded by photons that travel perpendicular to the direction of the spaceships.

The person in A will think "Hmm, due to length contraction, the rate at which he gets hit by photons is smaller than mine"

Person B will think the same way.

Person C in the observer frame will think that both ships will get hit at the same rate.

How do you resolve this contradiction?

There is no contradiction, all three statements are correct.
 
What I mean is, say person A and person B note down the number of photons that hit them. When they compare their readings, will they differ? And if they do, who got hit more times?
 
You need to specify the times at which they should start counting and stop counting.

If A says "I got hit by n photons between 12:00 and 12:01 on my clock", then B would say exactly the same. What you seem to be overlooking is that the events where A's clock change to 12:00 and to 12:01 are not one minute apart in B's frame.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top