1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Trying to write falling rod energies as Hamiltonian

  1. Sep 24, 2008 #1
    "Consider an infinitely sharp pin of mass M and height H perfectly balanced on its tip. Assume that the mass of the pin is all at the ball on the top of the pin. Classically, we expect the pin to remain in this state forever. Quantum mechanics, however, predicts that the pin will fall over within a finite amount of time. This can be shown as follows:
    Show that the total energy of the pin (aka. the Hamiltonian) can be expressed in the
    form:
    E = Ap^2 − Bx^2
    if we assume that x << H. p is the momentum of the pin and x is the lateral displacement of the head of the pin. Find expressions for A and B."


    My attempt:
    When the pin head moves laterally a distance x, it will have lost some gravitational energy equal to E_g = mg\sqrt{H^2-x^2}.
    My first shot at this is to write E = P^2/(2m) + mgy, where y= \sqrt{H^2-x^2}; however, I don't think this can be reduced to the form called for. Suggestions?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2008 #2
    You should do a Taylor approximation of the expression y= \sqrt{H^2-x^2}. For x/H << 1, sqrt{H^2-x^2} = H sqrt{1-(x/H)^2} = H (1 - (1/2)(x/H)^2 + ...). The first term is a constant, and the second is the one you need.
     
  4. Sep 24, 2008 #3
    Thank you very much for your help, but I'm a little uncertain what you mean by

    This approximation results in the term E = (1/2m)p^2 + mgy, where y = H-x^2/{2H}, which I can't write in the form Bx^2. Is the constant term is not relevant?
     
  5. Sep 24, 2008 #4

    gabbagabbahey

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Shouldn't you have:
    [tex]\Delta E = \frac{p^2}{2m} + mgy[/tex]
    And assuming conservation of Energy:
    [tex]\Delta E=0[/tex]
     
  6. Sep 24, 2008 #5
    Hamiltonian is always uncertain up to an additive constant (it is because the equations of motion involve only the derivatives of Hamiltonian). Just remember that you are free to choose any point to be reference point and have energy E=0.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Trying to write falling rod energies as Hamiltonian
Loading...